Comparison of different dispersion models with tracer experiment

被引：4
|
作者：
Alessandrini, S [1 ]
Ferrero, E
Pertot, C
Orlandi, E
机构：
[1] CESI, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dipartimento Sci & Tecnol Avanzate, Alessandria, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Fis, Milan, Italy
来源：
NUOVO CIMENTO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI FISICA C-COLLOQUIA ON PHYSICS | 2005年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1393/ncc/i2005-10187-0
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
An intercomparison between three different models is presented. The simulated case is a tracer experiment performed in complex terrain. Two dispersion models are initialised with a meteorological model that can use as input the ECMWF analysis only or both these analysis and local measurements. The results demonstrate that the best performances are obtained by using the dispersion models coupled with a meteorological model. Moreover the Lagrangian model seems to slightly better perform when the local measurements are accounted for.
引用
收藏
页码：141 / 149
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of different dispersion models with tracer experiment
    Alessandrini, S.
    Ferrero, E.
    Pertot, C.
    Orlandi, E.
    [J]. NUOVO CIMENTO C-COLLOQUIA AND COMMUNICATIONS IN PHYSICS, 2005, 28 (02): : 141 - 149
  • [2] The European Tracer Experiment ETEX: A comparison of long range atmospheric dispersion models in different weather conditions
    Graziani, G
    Klug, W
    Mosca, S
    [J]. AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XII, 1998, 22 : 285 - 292
  • [3] Tracer experiments in the Freiburg-Schauinsland area - Comparison with flow and dispersion models
    Brucher, W
    Kerschgens, MJ
    Martens, R
    Thielen, H
    Massmeyer, K
    [J]. METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 1998, 7 (01) : 32 - 35
  • [4] Urban tracer dispersion experiment in London (DAPPLE) 2003: field study and comparison with empirical prediction
    Martin, D.
    Nickless, G.
    Price, C. S.
    Britter, R. E.
    Neophytou, M. K.
    Cheng, H.
    Robins, A. G.
    Dobre, A.
    Belcher, S. E.
    Barlow, J. F.
    Tomlin, A. S.
    Smalley, R. J.
    Tate, J. E.
    Colvile, R. N.
    Arnold, S. J.
    Shallcross, D. E.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2010, 11 (04): : 241 - 248
  • [5] Dispersion simulations using HYSPLIT for the Sagebrush Tracer Experiment
    Ngan, Fong
    Stein, Ariel
    Finn, Dennis
    Eckman, Richard
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 186 : 18 - 31
  • [6] Dispersion coefficient of streams from tracer experiment data
    Singh, SK
    Beck, MB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2003, 129 (06): : 539 - 546
  • [7] Pollutant dispersion in a heavily industrialized region:Comparison of different models
    Soler, Maria R.
    Ortega, Sara
    Soriano, Cecilia
    Pino, David
    Alarcon, Marta
    [J]. AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATIONS XVII, 2007, 17 : 671 - +
  • [8] Pollutant dispersion close to an urban surface – the BUBBLE tracer experiment
    M. W. Rotach
    S.-E. Gryning
    E. Batchvarova
    A. Christen
    R. Vogt
    [J]. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2004, 87 : 39 - 56
  • [9] Tracer gas experiment to verify the dispersion from a tall stack
    Sivertsen, B
    Irwin, JS
    [J]. NINTH JOINT CONFERENCE ON APPLICATIONS OF AIR POLLUTION METEOROLOGY WITH A&WMA, 1996, : 41 - 45
  • [10] Pollutant dispersion close to an urban surface - the BUBBLE tracer experiment
    Rotach, MW
    Gryning, SE
    Batchvarova, E
    Christen, A
    Vogt, R
    [J]. METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2004, 87 (1-3) : 39 - 56
12345