The rivalry between truth and privilege:: The weakness of the Supreme Court's instrumental reasoning in Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 US 1 (1996)

被引：0

|

作者：

Imwinkelried, E ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA

来源：

HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL | 1998年 / 49卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：969 / 990

页数：22

相关论文

共 4 条

[1] Jaffee v. Redmond: The Supreme Court recognizes a psychotherapist-patient privilege in federal courts
Knapp, S
VandeCreek, L
[J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1997, 28 (06) : 567 - 572
[2] Jaffee v. Redmond's impact:: Life after the supreme court's recognition of a psychotherapist-patient privilege
Shuman, DW
Foote, W
[J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1999, 30 (05) : 479 - 487
[3] The Supreme Court's decision to recognize a psychotherapist privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond, 116 s. ct. 1923 (1996): The meaning of "experience" and the role of "reason" under federal rule of evidence 501
Amann, DM
Imwinkelried, EJ
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW, 1997, 65 (04) : 1019 - 1049
[4] Between Hamidreza Haghdust, Plaintiff, and British Columbia Lottery Corporation, Defendant And between Michael Lee, Plaintiff, and British Columbia Lottery Corporation, Defendant Brought under the Class Proceedings Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 50 Haghdust v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. Dockets: S105520, S113596; Registry: Vancouver British Columbia Supreme Court Vancouver, British Columbia JUDGES: J.E.D. Savage J. [2013] B.C.J. No. 16; 2013 BCSC 16; 2013 BC.C. LEXIS 16 January 8, 2013
不详
[J]. GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2013, 17 (05): : 356 - 368