A preliminary evaluation of GOES-16 active fire product using Landsat-8 and VIIRS active fire data, and ground-based prescribed fire records

被引:46
|
作者
Li, Fangjun [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyang [1 ]
Kondragunta, Shobha [2 ]
Schmidt, Christopher C. [3 ]
Holmes, Christopher D. [4 ]
机构
[1] South Dakota State Univ, Dept Geog, Geospatial Sci Ctr Excellence, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[2] NOAA, NESDIS, Ctr Satellite Applicat & Res, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, CIMSS, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Florida State Univ, Dept Earth Ocean & Atmospher Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
GOES-16; Landsat8; VIIRS; Active fire product evaluation; Southeastern CONUS; BIOMASS-BURNING EMISSIONS; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES; RADIATIVE POWER; AIR-QUALITY; DETECTION ALGORITHM; MODIS; SATELLITE; IMPACT; VALIDATION; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2019.111600
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Satellite-based active fire data provide indispensable information for monitoring global fire activity and understanding its impacts on climate and air quality. Yet the limited spatiotemporal sampling capacities of current satellites result in considerable uncertainties in fire observation and emissions estimation. The mitigation of these uncertainties mainly relies on new remote-sensing technology. The Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) onboard the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-R (GOES-R) Series observes fires across North and South Americas at an unprecedentedly spatiotemporal resolution of nominal 2 km every 5-15 min. This study evaluated the GOES-16 (the first GOES-R satellite) ABI active fire product using active fire data derived from the 30-m Landsat-8 and the 375-m and 750-m Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS), and ground-based burning data across the southeastern Conterminous United States (CONUS) during the 2018 peak fire season. Specifically, we characterized the overall fire detection performance of the ABI active fire detections, estimated omission and commission errors, and evaluated ABI fire radiative power (FRP). The results showed that the ABI fire detection probability and its omission and commission errors were highly related to fire size and temporal period. ABI detection probability was higher than 95% for the fire pixel that contained over 114 Landsat-8 (30 m) fire detections or 11 VIIRS (375 m) detections. During a period of +/- 8 h, ABI detected 19% and 29% more fires observed by Landsat-8 and 375-m VIIRS, respectively. Correspondingly, the omission error could reduce by up to 33%. Further, ABI was able to detect 6-22% and 31-42% more ground-recorded fires than VIIRS in Georgia and Florida States, respectively, but ABI still missed many very small fires because ABI was hard to detect fires smaller than similar to 34.5 MW. Additionally, compared with 750-m VIIRS FRP, ABI FRP was similar to 30-50% larger in individual fire events but was overall similar at a regional scale.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Active fire detection using Landsat-8/OLI data
    Schroeder, Wilfrid
    Oliva, Patricia
    Giglio, Louis
    Quayle, Brad
    Lorenz, Eckehard
    Morelli, Fabiano
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 185 : 210 - 220
  • [2] An Enhanced Algorithm for Active Fire Detection in Croplands Using Landsat-8 OLI Data
    Jiang, Yizhu
    Kong, Jinling
    Zhong, Yanling
    Zhang, Qiutong
    Zhang, Jingya
    [J]. LAND, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [3] Validation of GOES-16 ABI and MSG SEVIRI active fire products
    Hall, J., V
    Zhang, R.
    Schroeder, W.
    Huang, C.
    Giglio, L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2019, 83
  • [4] POST-FIRE ASSESSMENT OF BURNED AREAS WITH LANDSAT-8 AND SENTINEL-2 IMAGERY TOGETHER WITH MODIS AND VIIRS ACTIVE FIRE PRODUCTS
    Angelino, Cesario Vincenzo
    Cicala, Luca
    Parrilli, Sara
    Fiscante, Nicomino
    Ullo, Silvia Liberata
    [J]. IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2020, : 6770 - 6773
  • [5] Forest fire spread simulation based on VIIRS active fire data and FARSITE model
    Benben X.
    Weiye W.
    Liangfu C.
    Jinhua T.
    Xuanyu J.
    Chengjie Z.
    Meng F.
    [J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2022, 26 (08) : 1575 - 1588
  • [6] Active Fire Detection from Landsat-8 Imagery Using Deep Multiple Kernel Learning
    Rostami, Amirhossein
    Shah-Hosseini, Reza
    Asgari, Shabnam
    Zarei, Arastou
    Aghdami-Nia, Mohammad
    Homayouni, Saeid
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [7] Comparison of the Hazard Mapping System (HMS) fire product to ground-based fire records in Georgia, USA
    Hu, Xuefei
    Yu, Chao
    Tian, Di
    Ruminski, Mark
    Robertson, Kevin
    Waller, Lance A.
    Liu, Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (06) : 2901 - 2910
  • [8] Assessment of VIIRS 375 m active fire using tropical peatland combustion algorithm applied to Landsat-8 over Indonesia's peatlands
    Sofan, Parwati
    Bruce, David
    Schroeder, Wilfrid
    Jones, Eriita
    Marsden, Jackie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2020, 13 (12) : 1695 - 1716
  • [9] Geostationary active fire products validation: GOES-17 ABI, GOES-16 ABI, and Himawari AHI
    Hall, J. V.
    Schroeder, W.
    Rishmawi, K.
    Wooster, M.
    Schmidt, C. C.
    Huang, C.
    Csiszar, I.
    Giglio, L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 44 (10) : 3174 - 3193
  • [10] Global operational land imager Landsat-8 reflectance-based active fire detection algorithm
    Kumar, S. S.
    Roy, D. P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2018, 11 (02) : 154 - 178