Participant Selection for Inpatient Physical Rehabilitation

被引:0
|
作者
Hyslop, Brent [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Southern Dist Hlth Board, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
rehabilitation; selection; bias; criteria; Code of Patients' Rights;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Intensive, inpatient physical rehabilitation in a dedicated unit can have a hugely positive influence on a person's life after a major injury or illness. This resource, however, is scarce and not every participant will benefit. Appropriate and fair participant selection for inpatient rehabilitation is therefore vital. This article considers challenges in these selection decisions, including the potential for inconsistency, bias and controversy, and the limits of evidence-based selection criteria. To provide best care in this setting, this article suggests that a clear process of decision-making is also important, alongside the use of objective selection criteria. One possible framework for this selection process is New Zealand's Health and Disability Commissioner Code of Patients' Rights, which is informative for clinicians and health authorities in rehabilitation selection in all jurisdictions, and which supports appropriate and fair participant selection.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 427
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation
    Brandstater, Murray E.
    PM&R, 2011, 3 (12) : 1079 - 1082
  • [2] Assessing Physical Activity in Inpatient Rehabilitation: Validity, Practicality, and Sensitivity to Change in the Physical Activity in Inpatient Rehabilitation Assessment
    Denkinger, Michael D.
    Lindemann, Ulrich
    Nicolai, Simone
    Igl, Wilmar
    Jamour, Michael
    Nikolaus, Thorsten
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (12): : 2012 - 2017
  • [3] Participant evaluation of an inpatient occupational therapy groups programme in brain injury rehabilitation
    Patterson, Freyr
    Fleming, Jennifer
    Doig, Emmah
    Griffin, Janelle
    AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, 2017, 64 (05) : 408 - 418
  • [4] CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF A PAYMENT METHOD FOR INPATIENT MEDICAL REHABILITATION
    TEPPER, S
    DEJONG, G
    WILKERSON, D
    BRANNON, R
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (04): : 349 - 354
  • [5] Validity of 3 physical performance measures in inpatient geriatric rehabilitation
    Brooks, D
    Davis, AM
    Naglie, G
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 87 (01): : 105 - 110
  • [6] The validity and importance of assessing physical activity in inpatient rehabilitation the PAIR
    Denkinger, Michael D.
    Englert, Luise
    Nikolaus, Thorsten
    Jamour, Michael
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2008, 41 : 83 - 83
  • [7] Effects of Inpatient Multicomponent Occupational Rehabilitation on Physical Activity Levels
    Fimland, Marius S.
    Skagseth, Martin
    Nilsen, Tom I. L.
    Aasdahl, Lene
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (06): : 360 - 360
  • [8] Performance-based criteria are used in participant selection for pulmonary rehabilitation programs
    Walsh, James R.
    McKeough, Zoe J.
    Morris, Norman R.
    Paratz, Jenny D.
    AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2013, 37 (03) : 331 - 336
  • [9] American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Position Statement on Definitions for Rehabilitation Physician and Director of Rehabilitation in Inpatient Rehabilitation Settings
    Laker, Scott R.
    Adair, William A., III
    Annaswamy, Thiru M.
    Frank, Lawrence W.
    Hatzakis, Michael, Jr.
    Hubbell, Susan L.
    Ifejika, Nneka L.
    Ivanhoe, Cindy B.
    Jones, Valerie A.
    Lupinacci, Michael F.
    Purcell, Annie D.
    Standaert, Christopher J.
    Dolak, Melanie A.
    PM&R, 2019, 11 (01) : 98 - 102
  • [10] Selection for Inpatient Rehabilitation After Acute Stroke: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Hakkennes, Sharon J.
    Brock, Kim
    Hill, Keith D.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (12): : 2057 - 2070