Standalone titanium/polyetheretherketone interbody cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Clinical and radiological results at 24 months

被引:1
|
作者
Mobbs, Ralph J. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Amin, Tajrian [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Phan, Kevin [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Al Khawaja, Darweesh [3 ]
Choy, Wen Jie [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Parr, William C. H. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Lovric, Vedran [1 ,4 ]
Walsh, William R. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales UNSW, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] NeuroSpine Surg Res Grp NSURG, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Nepean Neurosurg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Prince Wales Hosp, Surg Orthoped Res Lab SORL, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[5] Prince Wales Private Hosp, NeuroSpine Clin, Randwick, NSW, Australia
来源
关键词
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; bone morphogenetic protein-2; integral fixation; polyetheretherketone; supercritical CO2 allograft; titanium; PEEK; DISKECTOMY; TRAUMA; SPINE;
D O I
10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_133_21
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Context: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a common procedure for patients suffering degenerative, deformity, or posttraumatic pathologies of the lumbar spine. Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a combination Titanium/Polyetheretherketone (Ti/PEEK) 3-screw fixation ALIF cage. Settings and Design: This was a prospective multisurgeon series of 87 patients (105 implants), with a minimum 24-month follow-up. Twelve patients (12/87) were supplemented with posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for additional stability for pars defect spondylolisthesis correction. Radiological follow-up with fine-cut computed tomography (CT) scan occurred at 4-6 months, and again at 18-24 months if no fusion observed on initial CT, was performed to evaluate early and final fusion rates, and integration of the Ti/PEEK cage at the end-plate junction. Clinical follow-up included the subjective measures of pain and functional status and objective wearable device monitoring. Results: The fusion rate was 85% (97/105 implants) 6 months postoperatively, with no implant-related complications, and 95% at 24 months, based on independent radiological assessment. Patients experienced statistically significant improvement in subjective pain and functional outcomes compared to preoperative status. The objective measures revealed a daily step count with a 27% improvement, and gait velocity with a mean increase from 0.97 m/s to 1.18 m/s, at 3 months postoperatively. Conclusions: A Ti/PEEK cage, with allograft and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), achieved rapid interbody progression to fusion and is an effective implant for use in anterior lumbar surgery with high early fusion rates and no peri-endplate lucency. Supercritical CO2 allograft provided an osteoconductive scaffold and combined well with BMP-2 to facilitate fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 47
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical and radiological outcomes of titanium cage versus polyetheretherketone cage in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Haozhong
    Zhang, Hao
    Xiao, Changming
    Zhang, Kaiquan
    Qi, Lisheng
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2025, 48 (01)
  • [2] Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Direct Lumbar Interbody Fusion : Clinical and Radiological Results
    Lee, Young Seok
    Kim, Young Baeg
    Park, Seung Won
    Chung, Chan
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 56 (06) : 469 - 474
  • [3] Combination Ti/PEEK ALIF cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Early clinical and radiological results
    Mobbs, Ralph Jasper
    Phan, Kevin
    Assem, Yusuf
    Pelletier, Matthew
    Walsh, William R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 34 : 94 - 99
  • [4] The in vitro stabilising effect of polyetheretherketone cages versus a titanium cage of similar design for anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Spruit, M
    Falk, RG
    Beckmann, L
    Steffen, T
    Castelein, RM
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (08) : 752 - 758
  • [5] The in vitro stabilising effect of polyetheretherketone cages versus a titanium cage of similar design for anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    M. Spruit
    R. G. Falk
    L. Beckmann
    T. Steffen
    R. M. Castelein
    European Spine Journal, 2005, 14 : 752 - 758
  • [6] Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage
    Dominik Adl Amini
    Ichiro Okano
    Lisa Oezel
    Jiaqi Zhu
    Erika Chiapparelli
    Jennifer Shue
    Andrew A. Sama
    Frank P. Cammisa
    Federico P. Girardi
    Alexander P. Hughes
    European Spine Journal, 2021, 30 : 2377 - 2384
  • [7] Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage
    Adl Amini, Dominik
    Okano, Ichiro
    Oezel, Lisa
    Zhu, Jiaqi
    Chiapparelli, Erika
    Shue, Jennifer
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 30 (08) : 2377 - 2384
  • [8] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Cage Retrieval for the Treatment of Pseudarthrosis After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Safaee, Michael
    Tenorio, Alexander
    Haddad, Alexander F.
    Wu, Bian
    Hu, Serena
    Tay, Bobby
    Burch, Shane
    Berven, Sigurd
    Deviren, Vedat
    Dhall, Sanjay S.
    Chou, Dean
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Eichler, Charles
    Ames, Christopher P.
    Clark, Aaron J.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 67 : 269 - 270
  • [9] A Radiological Comparison of Anterior Fusion Rates in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    McCarthy, M. J. H.
    Ng, L.
    Vermeersch, G.
    Chan, D.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 2 (04) : 195 - 206
  • [10] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Sheng-Dan Jiang
    Jiang-Wei Chen
    Lei-Sheng Jiang
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2012, 132 : 1259 - 1266