Local feedback mechanism based on consistency-derived for consensus building in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations

被引:28
|
作者
Wu, Peng [1 ]
Zhu, Jiaming [1 ]
Zhou, Ligang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Huayou [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ, Sch Math Sci, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, China Inst Mfg Dev, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decision making; Hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations; Consensus process; Priority weights; Probability sampling; TERM SETS; MULTIPLICATIVE CONSISTENCY; ADDITIVE CONSISTENCY; MODELS; COMPATIBILITY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2019.106001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Considering that hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation (HFLPR) is an effective way to express decision makers' (DMs') hesitant qualitative preference information for a pair of alternatives or attributes, this paper pays attention to priority weights and consensus of HFLPRs in group decision making (GDM). First, a new similarity measure is presented to measure the similarity of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs), then a consensus improving process with local feedback mechanism is developed to improve the consensus level of HFLPRs until they satisfy a predefined consensus threshold. The new consensus improving process not only provides some specific adjustment scales for DMs, but also maintains the consistency of HFLPRs. After that, a mixed 0-1 programming model is put forward to derive the priority weights of HFLPR. Finally, an example of an investment project selection details the application of the proposed methods and comparative analysis demonstrates the practicability of the proposed methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations
    Wu, Zhibin
    Xu, Jiuping
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 65 : 28 - 40
  • [2] Group decision making based on acceptable multiplicative consistency and consensus of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 541 : 531 - 550
  • [3] A consistency and consensus-based method for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 501 : 317 - 336
  • [4] Consensus reaching with consistency control in group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations
    Li, Zhuolin
    Zhang, Zhen
    Yu, Wenyu
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 170
  • [5] Group decision making based on multiplicative consistency and consensus of fuzzy linguistic preference relations
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    Wang, Chao
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 509 : 71 - 86
  • [6] Group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency and consensus
    Li, Jian
    Niu, Li-li
    Chen, Qiongxia
    Wang, Zhong-xing
    Li, Wenjing
    [J]. COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2022, 8 (03) : 2203 - 2225
  • [7] Group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency and consensus
    Jian Li
    Li-li Niu
    Qiongxia Chen
    Zhong-xing Wang
    Wenjing Li
    [J]. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2022, 8 : 2203 - 2225
  • [8] Optimizing consistency and consensus improvement process for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations and the application in group decision making
    Liu, Hongbin
    Jiang, Le
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 56 : 114 - 127
  • [9] Group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 514 : 354 - 368
  • [10] Group decision making based on acceptable consistency analysis of interval linguistic hesitant fuzzy preference relations
    Meng, Fanyong
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    Zhang, Shaolin
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 530 : 66 - 84