Infant sustained attention but not joint attention to objects at 9 months predicts vocabulary at 12 and 15 months

被引:97
|
作者
Yu, Chen [1 ]
Suanda, Sumarga H. [2 ]
Smith, Linda B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Program Cognit Sci, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Bloomington, IN USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Dept Psychol Sci, Storrs, CT USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
eye tracking; joint attention; language development; sustained attention; word learning; CHILD-DIRECTED SPEECH; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; FOCUSED ATTENTION; LANGUAGE; QUALITY; INPUT; INTERVENTIONS; RECOGNITION; ACHIEVEMENT; PATHWAYS;
D O I
10.1111/desc.12735
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Vocabulary differences early in development are highly predictive of later language learning as well as achievement in school. Early word learning emerges in the context of tightly coupled social interactions between the early learner and a mature partner. In the present study, we develop and apply a novel paradigm-dual head-mounted eye tracking-to record momentary gaze data from both parents and infants during free-flowing toy-play contexts. With fine-grained sequential patterns extracted from continuous gaze streams, we objectively measure both joint attention and sustained attention as parents and 9-month-old infants played with objects and as parents named objects during play. We show that both joint attention and infant sustained attention predicted vocabulary sizes at 12 and 15 months, but infant sustained attention in the context of joint attention, not joint attention itself, is the stronger unique predictor of later vocabulary size. Joint attention may predict word learning because joint attention supports infant attention to the named object.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Parental Speech at 6 Months Predicts Joint Attention at 12 Months
    Roberts, Siwan
    Fyfield, Rhiannon
    Baibazarova, Eugenia
    van Goozen, Stephanie
    Culling, John F.
    Hay, Dale F.
    [J]. INFANCY, 2013, 18 : E1 - E15
  • [2] Frontolimbic neural circuitry at 6 months predicts individual differences in joint attention at 9 months
    Elison, Jed T.
    Wolff, Jason J.
    Heimer, Debra C.
    Paterson, Sarah J.
    Gu, Hongbin
    Hazlett, Heather C.
    Styner, Martin
    Gerig, Guido
    Piven, Joseph
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2013, 16 (02) : 186 - 197
  • [3] Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age
    Carpenter, M
    Nagell, K
    Tomasello, M
    [J]. MONOGRAPHS OF THE SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 63 (04) : V - 143
  • [4] Sharing attention and pointing to objects at 12 months: is the intentional stance implied?
    Legerstee, M
    Barillas, Y
    [J]. COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 18 (01) : 91 - 110
  • [5] A longitudinal investigation of the still-face effect at 6 months and joint attention at 12 months
    Yazbek, Aimee
    D'Entremont, Barbara
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 24 : 589 - 601
  • [6] Observing effortful adults enhances not perseverative but sustained attention in infants aged 12 months
    Shinya, Yuta
    Ishibashi, Mikako
    [J]. COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 64
  • [7] Joint attention with the mother and the father at 10 months of age
    Martins, Carla
    Mateus, Vera
    Osorio, Ana
    Martins, Eva Costa
    Soares, Isabel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 11 (03) : 319 - 330
  • [8] Attention to Faces Expressing Negative Emotion at 7 Months Predicts Attachment Security at 14 Months
    Peltola, Mikko J.
    Forssman, Linda
    Puura, Kaija
    van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.
    Leppanen, Jukka M.
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 86 (05) : 1321 - 1332
  • [9] Infant Attention to Dynamic Audiovisual Stimuli: Look Duration From 3 to 9 Months of Age
    Reynolds, Greg D.
    Zhang, Dantong
    Guy, Maggie W.
    [J]. INFANCY, 2013, 18 (04) : 554 - 577
  • [10] Sustained attention at age 5 predicts attention-related problems at age 9
    Martin, Anne
    Razza, Rachel A.
    Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 36 (06) : 413 - 419