2D Versus 3D in Laparoscopic Surgery by Beginners and Experts: A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Pelvitrainer in Objectively Graded Surgical Steps

被引:29
|
作者
Spille, Johannes [1 ]
Wenners, Antonia [1 ,2 ]
von Hehn, Ulrike [3 ]
Maass, Nicolai [1 ]
Pecks, Ulrich [1 ]
Mettler, Liselotte [1 ]
Alkatout, Ibrahim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
[2] Pk Clin, Fertil Ctr Kiel, Dept Reprod Med, Kiel, Germany
[3] Medistat, Inst Med Informat & Stat, Kiel, Germany
关键词
laparoscopic training; gynecologic surgery; 2D laparoscopy; 3D laparoscopy; sacrocolpopexy; laparoscopic suturing; 3-DIMENSIONAL HIGH-DEFINITION; ENDOSCOPY; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; SKILLS; TASKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.01.011
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Progress in endoscopic surgery in the past few decades has led to the application of 3-dimensional (3D) procedures in operating rooms. This permits patient- and surgeon-friendly operations and also maximizes the superiority of laparoscopy over laparotomy. In this study, we compare 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D endoscopy techniques with regard to time, efficiency, optics, and handling by users with different degrees of experience at 4 difficulty levels. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial on a pelvitrainer in objectively graded surgical steps for students and postgraduates. SETTING: The trials took place at the Kiel School of Gynaecological Endoscopy, a training unit of the Kiel University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, a tertiary academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: The 277 study participants, divided into students, residents, and specialists, worked on pelvitrainers with 2 different optical systems, the 2D full HD and the 3D mode. The following 4 exercises were performed with each optical system: (1) grasping and transferring of pins, (2) cutting predetermined marks, (3) vaginal closure with prevention of prolapse, and (4) sacrocolpopexy. The duration and success of the tasks were measured and compared. A self-assessment questionnaire was completed by the participants. RESULTS: Overall, the 3D-system permitted a greater improvement in working speed, superior optical visualization, and better endoscopic handling in all groups, independent of surgical experience. All students improved in speed (exercises: 1-3) and made significantly fewer mistakes (exercise 2) on 3D compared with 2D. Residents made progress in time (exercises: 1-4) and task performance (exercise 3). Specialists improved significantly in the more challenging tasks 3 and 4. Subjectively, 68.8% of participants preferred 3D for performing laparoscopy. CONCLUSION: Systematic training programs on pelvitrainers can improve endoscopic skills not only in beginners but also in experienced surgeons. The 3D system offered distinct advantages over 2D imaging and was well arfrpted by surgeons. (C) 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 877
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized, controlled trial comparing the clinical outcomes of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Song, Taejong
    Kang, Du-young
    [J]. VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2022, 17 (01) : 127 - 133
  • [2] A laparoscopic study investigating 3D vs 2D imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model with experts, non-experts, and students
    Tibor Andrea Zwimpfer
    Dominik Lacher
    Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer
    Michael Mueller
    [J]. BMC Surgery, 20
  • [3] A laparoscopic study investigating 3D vs 2D imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model with experts, non-experts, and students
    Zwimpfer, Tibor Andrea
    Lacher, Dominik
    Fellmann-Fischer, Bernhard
    Mueller, Michael
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [4] Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an interim report
    Lu, Jun
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Zheng, Hua-Long
    Li, Ping
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Jia-Bin
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Chen, Qi-Yue
    Cao, Long-Long
    Lin, Mi
    Tu, Ru-Hong
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (07): : 2939 - 2945
  • [5] Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an interim report
    Jun Lu
    Chao-Hui Zheng
    Hua-Long Zheng
    Ping Li
    Jian-Wei Xie
    Jia-Bin Wang
    Jian-Xian Lin
    Qi-Yue Chen
    Long-Long Cao
    Mi Lin
    Ru-Hong Tu
    Chang-Ming Huang
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 2939 - 2945
  • [6] 2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery—results of a prospective randomized trial
    Alexander Buia
    Florian Stockhausen
    Natalie Filmann
    Ernst Hanisch
    [J]. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2017, 402 : 1241 - 1253
  • [7] Comparison of 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy with a 2D procedure for gastric cancer: A phase 3 randomized controlled trial
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Lu, Jun
    Zheng, Hua-Long
    Li, Ping
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Jia-Bin
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Chen, Qi-Yue
    Cao, Long-Long
    Lin, Mi
    Tu, Ru-Hong
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    [J]. SURGERY, 2018, 163 (02) : 300 - 304
  • [8] Randomized, controlled phase III trial comparing 3D and 2D laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Huang Changming
    Lu Jun
    Zheng Hua-Long
    Zheng Chao-Hui
    Li Ping
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [9] Randomized, controlled Phase III trial comparing 3D and 2D laparoscopic gastrcetomy for gastric cancer
    Lu, J.
    Chang-Ming, H.
    Zheng, C.
    Li, P.
    Xie, J.
    Lin, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [10] 2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-results of a prospective randomized trial
    Buia, Alexander
    Stockhausen, Florian
    Filmann, Natalie
    Hanisch, Ernst
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2017, 402 (08) : 1241 - 1253