Autocorrelation and cepstral methods for measurement of tibial cortical thickness

被引:42
|
作者
Wear, KA [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/TUFFC.2003.1209552
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Cortical thickness of the tibia is related to stress fracture risk and overall skeletal status. Two methods are proposed for estimating tibial cortical thickness based on power spectra of ultrasonic echoes containing reflections from front and back surfaces of the cortex. The locations of the peaks in the autocorrelation function and the cepstrum are related to cortical thickness. Data were acquired on plastic plates in order to validate the methodology. These data indicate high correlations between estimated and true thickness with correlation coefficients r = 0.99, (95% confidence interval: 0.993-1.00) for the autocorrelation method and r = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.996-1.00) for the cepstral method. Data on six tibia samples in vitro indicate correlation coefficients of r = 0.92 (95% CI: 0.72-1.00) for the autocorrelation method and r = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.62-0.94) for the cepstral method. Estimates of precisions of the two methods were 0.3 +/- 0.1 mm (autocorrelation method) and 0.5 +/- 0.2 mm (cepstral method). One measurement in a human volunteer in vivo demonstrated clinical feasibility of the measurement and good agreement with cortical thickness assessed using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (QCT). This technology offers the promise of an inexpensive, fast, portable, simple, nonionizing technique for assessing skeletal status.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 660
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cortical thickness estimation in longitudinal stroke studies: A comparison of 3 measurement methods
    Li, Qi
    Pardoe, Heath
    Lichter, Renee
    Werden, Emilio
    Raffelt, Audrey
    Cumming, Toby
    Brodtmann, Amy
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2015, 8 : 526 - 535
  • [2] Registration based cortical thickness measurement
    Das, Sandhitsu R.
    Avants, Brian B.
    Grossman, Murray
    Gee, James C.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 45 (03) : 867 - 879
  • [3] Direct Measurement of Tibial Cortical Bone Surface Area
    Cattrysse, E.
    Scafoglieri, A.
    Louis, O.
    De Mey, J.
    Clarys, J. P.
    CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2010, 23 (06) : 720 - 725
  • [4] Prediction of Cortical Bone Thickness Variations in the Tibial Diaphysis of Running Rats
    George, Daniel
    Pallu, Stephane
    Bourzac, Celine
    Wazzani, Rkia
    Allena, Rachele
    Remond, Yves
    Portier, Hugues
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [5] Effect of morphology and cortical thickness variations on tibial strains in different movements
    Long, Ting
    Besier, Thor F.
    Fernandez, Justin
    Yeung, Ted
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2025, 179
  • [6] COMPARISON OF THICKNESS MEASUREMENT METHODS
    CROMBIE, P
    APPITA, 1972, 26 (03): : 203 - 206
  • [7] OPTICAL METHODS FOR THICKNESS MEASUREMENT
    BIDDLES, BJ
    LOBB, DR
    ZELLSTOFF UND PAPIER, 1972, 21 (01): : 26 - &
  • [8] Influence of Processing Pipeline on Cortical Thickness Measurement
    Masouleh, Shahrzad Kharabian
    Eickhoff, Simon B.
    Zeighami, Yashar
    Lewis, Lindsay B.
    Dahnke, Robert
    Gaser, Christian
    Chouinard-Decorte, Francois
    Lepage, Claude
    Scholtens, Lianne H.
    Hoffstaedter, Felix
    Glahn, David C.
    Blangero, John
    Evans, Alan C.
    Genon, Sarah
    Valk, Sofie L.
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2020, 30 (09) : 5014 - 5027
  • [9] MEASUREMENT OF CORTICAL BONE THICKNESS BY A RADIONUCLIDE TECHNIQUE
    PAYNE, JT
    MOORE, R
    WAHNER, H
    LOKEN, MK
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1971, 12 (06) : 455 - &
  • [10] SENSE factors for reliable cortical thickness measurement
    Park, Hae-Jeong
    Youn, Tak
    Jeong, Seok-Oh
    Oh, Maeng-Keun
    Kim, Sei-Young
    Kim, Eung-Yeop
    NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 40 (01) : 187 - 196