Dynamic control for construction project scheduling on-the-run

被引:4
|
作者
Kammouh, O. [1 ]
Nogal, M. [2 ]
Binnekamp, R. [2 ]
Wolfert, A. R. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Delft, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
Stochastic construction scheduling; Mitigation control on-the-run; Probabilistic time-cost optimization; Penalty and reward scheme; Construction activity correlation; COST RISK ANALYSIS; EVALUATING NETWORKS; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104450
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Construction project management requires dynamic mitigation control to ensure a project's timely completion. Current mitigation approaches are usually performed by an iterative Monte Carlo (MC) analysis which does not reflect (1) the project manager's goal-oriented behavior, (2) contractual project completion performance schemes, and (3) stochastic dependence between construction activities. Therefore, the development statement within this paper is to design a method and implementation tool that properly dissolves all of the aforementioned shortcomings ensuring the project's completion date by finding the most effective and efficient mitigation strategy. For this purpose, the Mitigation Controller (MitC) has been developed using an integrative approach of nonlinear stochastic optimization techniques and probabilistic Monte Carlo analysis. MitC's applicability is demonstrated using a recent Dutch large infrastructure construction project showing its added value for dynamic control on-the-run. It is shown that the MitC is a state-of-the-art decision support tool that a-priori automates and optimizes the search for the best set of mitigation strategies on-the-run rather than a-posteriori evaluating the potentially sub-optimal and over-designed mitigation strategies (as commonly done with modern software such as Primavera P6).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The on-the-run liquidity phenomenon
    Pasquariello, Paolo
    Vega, Clara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 92 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [2] Is There an On-the-Run Premium in TIPS?
    Christensen, Jens H. E.
    Lopez, Jose A.
    Shultz, Patrick J.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2020, 10 (02)
  • [3] When Is a Treasury Security On-the-Run?
    Moore, Mark
    Winters, Drew
    [J]. FINANCIAL REVIEW, 2014, 49 (01) : 77 - 88
  • [4] Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling-Baseline Scheduling, Risk Analysis and Project Control
    Herroelen, Willy
    [J]. INTERFACES, 2013, 43 (01) : 107 - 108
  • [5] SCHEDULING AND PROJECT CONTROL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF POWER-PLANTS
    MEIER, H
    [J]. BROWN BOVERI REVIEW, 1979, 66 (08): : 517 - 521
  • [6] A search-based theory of the on-the-run phenomenon
    Vayanos, Dimitri
    Weill, Pierre-Olivier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2008, 63 (03): : 1361 - 1398
  • [7] Integral and dynamic methodology applied to scheduling and control project
    Jose Gonzalez, Leonardo
    Kalenatic, Dusko
    Vivivana Moreno, Karol
    [J]. REVISTA FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA-UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA, 2012, (62): : 21 - 32
  • [8] Who makes on-the-run Treasuries special?
    Graveline, Jeremy J.
    McBrady, Matthew R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 2011, 20 (04) : 620 - 632
  • [9] A model of the convenience yields in on-the-run treasuries
    Cherian J.A.
    Jacquier E.
    Jarrow R.A.
    [J]. Review of Derivatives Research, 2004, 7 (2) : 79 - 97
  • [10] Term structure estimation from on-the-run Treasuries
    Jordan, JV
    Mansi, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2003, 27 (08) : 1487 - 1509