Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart (IDegAsp) in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Edina, Brenda C. [1 ]
Tandaju, Jeremy R. [1 ]
Wiyono, Lowilius [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
meta-analysis; systematic review; insulin; diabetes mellitus type 2; idegasp; CO-FORMULATION; TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; ADULTS; BASAL; GLARGINE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.25612
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a prevalent metabolic disease requiring tight glycemic control of basal and postprandial glucose levels. Treatment intensification using separate basal and bolus injections increased the number of injections and reduced cost-effectivity, leading to decreased compliance and failure of glycemic control. Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart (IDegAsp), a novel premix of basal and bolus insulin, is one of the potential treatments for reducing the number of injections. However, its efficacy and safety have not been reviewed clearly. Therefore, this systematic review aims to compare the efficacy and safety of IDegAsp with standard basal and basal plus bolus insulin regimens. A systematic review of four databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Proquest) was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Search results were screened by eligibility criteria and critically appraised by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) tool and the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. Meta-Analysis was done using Review Manager to obtain cumulative outcomes from hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) changes, hypoglycemia incidents, and weight gain from all studies. Out of 132 search results, 10 studies were reviewed. IDegAsp once-daily administration was proven beneficial in reducing HbA1c levels and nocturnal hypoglycemia incidences, while IDegAsp twice-daily administration was proven beneficial in lowering hypoglycemia incidence and nocturnal hypoglycemia incidence. IDegAsp yielded better glycemic index results and lowered hypoglycemic incidents in the metaanalysis. Thus, it is concluded that IDegAsp once daily with stepwise titration on the largest meal of the day achieved most benefits with minimal risks.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Aspart 30 and Insulin Degludec/Aspart vs. Basal Insulin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis
    Mishriky, Basem M.
    Tanenberg, Robert J.
    Cummings, Doyle M.
    [J]. DIABETES, 2017, 66 : A252 - A252
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart versus Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Niu, Yan-Li
    Zhang, Ye
    Song, Zhi-Yong
    Zhao, Chuan-Zhi
    Luo, Yun
    Wang, Yan
    Yuan, Jing
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 53 (02) : 313 - 322
  • [3] The Study on the Clinical Efficacy of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart (IDegAsp)
    Kusama, Minoru
    [J]. DIABETES, 2018, 67
  • [4] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF INSULIN GLARGINE/LIXISENATIDE AND INSULIN DEGLUDEC/INSULIN ASPART IN TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENTS NOT CONTROLLED ON BASAL INSULIN: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
    Jammah, A.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 22 : A185 - A186
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart Compared with a Conventional Premixed Insulin or Basal Insulin: A Meta-Analysis
    Moon, Shinje
    Chung, Hye-Soo
    Kim, Yoon-Jung
    Yu, Jae-Myung
    Jeong, Woo-Ju
    Park, Jiwon
    Oh, Chang-Myung
    [J]. METABOLITES, 2021, 11 (09)
  • [6] Clinical efficacy and safety of insulin aspart compared with regular human insulin in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wojciechowski, Piotr
    Niemczyk-Szechowska, Patrycja
    Olewinska, Elzbieta
    Jaros, Patrycja
    Mierzejewska, Barbara
    Skarzynska-Duk, Joanna
    Malecki, Maciej T.
    Rys, Przemyslaw
    [J]. POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 125 (03): : 141 - 151
  • [7] Comparative efficiency and safety of insulin degludec/aspart with insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Long, Tao
    Lin, Jin-ting
    Lin, Min-hua
    Wu, Qian-long
    Lai, Jian-mei
    Li, Sheng-zhen
    Zhou, Zi-chao
    Zeng, Ji-yuan
    Huang, Jia-shuan
    Zeng, Chun-ping
    Lai, Yao-ming
    [J]. ENDOCRINE JOURNAL, 2022, 69 (08) : 959 - 969
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 units/mL vs insulin degludec in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alhmoud, Eman N.
    Saad, Mohamed Omar
    Omar, Nabil Elhadi
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [9] IDegAsp, a soluble insulin combination of ultra-long-acting insulin degludec and insulin aspart, in type 2 diabetes: comparison with biphasic insulin aspart 30
    Vaag, A.
    Leiter, L. A.
    Franek, E.
    Weng, J.
    Damci, T.
    Munoz Torres, M.
    Donnet, J. -P.
    Endahl, L.
    Skjoth, T.
    Niskanen, L.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2011, 54 : S423 - S423
  • [10] Comparative safety and efficacy of insulin degludec with insulin glargine in type 2 and type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Xiao-Wen
    Zhang, Xin-Lin
    Xu, Biao
    Kang, Li-Na
    [J]. ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2018, 55 (05) : 429 - 441