Investigating streamflow variability and hydroclimatic teleconnections: a comparison of regulated and unregulated streamflow stations

被引:0
|
作者
Pant, Tarun [1 ]
Ganapathy, Abinesh [1 ]
Agarwal, Ankit [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Roorkee, Dept Hydrol, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
climate indices; hydroclimatic teleconnections; regulated and unregulated stations; streamflow variability; wavelet analysis; INDIAN-OCEAN DIPOLE; WAVELET TRANSFORM; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUMMER MONSOON; MANN-KENDALL; TRENDS; BASIN; RIVER; PRECIPITATION; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.2166/wcc.2022.369
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the relationship between flow variability of unregulated and regulated streamflow stations and global climate indicators. Mann-Kendall and change-point analysis is applied to investigate the gradual and abrupt changes in streamflow data, followed by the investigation of multi-scale fluctuations in streamflow data using Continuous Wavelet Analysis. Linkages between streamflow and global climate indicators are examined using Cross-Wavelet and Wavelet Coherence Analysis. Results showed contrasting trend values for unregulated and regulated streamflow stations. Surprisingly, all unregulated stations experienced a significant abrupt shift in change point contrary to the regulated streamflow. Further, for unregulated stations, streamflow variability and hydroclimatic teleconnections were observed at a lower scale, indicating that variations in streamflow are more frequent and generally occur on an intra-annual to inter-annual scale. Contrary, regulated stations observed the streamflow variability and hydroclimatic teleconnections at a larger scale (8-10 years), indicating that all the fluctuations are smoothened out. Thus, unregulated stations cannot be used as a proxy for regulated stations in any given basin. Indeed, for better water resource planning and management, both regulated and unregulated streamflow should be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1150
页数:28
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Assessment of Streamflow Variability with Upgraded HydroClimatic Conceptual Streamflow Model
    Mayank Suman
    Rajib Maity
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2019, 33 : 1367 - 1382
  • [2] Assessment of Streamflow Variability with Upgraded HydroClimatic Conceptual Streamflow Model
    Suman, Mayank
    Maity, Rajib
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33 (04) : 1367 - 1382
  • [3] Streamflow variability in the Southern Appalachians and atmospheric teleconnections
    Sen, A. K.
    [J]. RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 28 (05) : 630 - 636
  • [4] Streamflow Variability in Colombian Pacific Basins and Their Teleconnections with Climate Indices
    Canchala, Teresita
    Ceron, Wilmar Loaiza
    Frances, Felix
    Carvajal-Escobar, Yesid
    Andreoli, Rita Valeria
    Kayano, Mary Toshie
    Alfonso-Morales, Wilfredo
    Caicedo-Bravo, Eduardo
    Ferreira de Souza, Rodrigo Augusto
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [5] Large-scale climate teleconnections with South Korean streamflow variability
    Lee, Jai Hong
    Julien, Pierre Y.
    Thornton, Christopher
    Lee, Chang Hae
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2020, 65 (01): : 57 - 70
  • [6] Sensitivity of Regulated Streamflow Regimes to Interannual Climate Variability
    Ferrazzi, Marta
    Vivian, Roberto
    Botter, Gianluca
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2019, 7 (11) : 1206 - 1219
  • [7] Streamflow variability and hydroclimatic change at the Bear Brook Watershed in Maine (BBWM), USA
    Jong-Suk Kim
    Shaleen Jain
    Stephen A. Norton
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2010, 171 : 47 - 58
  • [8] Streamflow variability and hydroclimatic change at the Bear Brook Watershed in Maine (BBWM), USA
    Kim, Jong-Suk
    Jain, Shaleen
    Norton, Stephen A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2010, 171 (1-4) : 47 - 58
  • [9] Warm season streamflow variability in the Korean Han River Basin: Links with atmospheric teleconnections
    Kim, Jong-Suk
    Jain, Shaleen
    Yoon, Sun-Kwon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2012, 32 (04) : 635 - 640