Factors that determine residents' acceptance of smart city technologies

被引:56
|
作者
Habib, Abdulrahman [1 ]
Alsmadi, Duha [2 ]
Prybutok, Victor R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas, Toulouse Grad Sch, Denton, TX 76203 USA
[2] Univ Petra, Fac Informat Technol, Amman, Jordan
关键词
Smart-city; e-government; trust in government; trust in technology; structural Equation model (SEM); survey; PERCEIVED SECURITY; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; PRIVACY CONCERNS; USER ACCEPTANCE; SELF-EFFICACY; CLOUD; ADOPTION; CHALLENGES; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1080/0144929X.2019.1693629
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
While some cities attempt to determine their residents' demand for smart-city technologies, others simply move forward with smart-related strategies and projects. This study is among the first to empirically determine which factors most affect residents' and public servants' intention to use smart-city services. A Smart Cities Stakeholders Adoption Model (SSA), based on Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2), is developed and tested on a mid-size U.S. city as a case study. A questionnaire was administered in order to determine the influence of seven factors - effort expectancy, self-efficacy, perceived privacy, perceived security, trust in technology, price value and trust in government - on behaviour intention, specifically the decision to adopt smart-city technologies. Results show that each of these factors significantly influenced citizen intention to use smart-city services. They also reveal perceived security and perceived privacy to be strong determinants of trust in technology, and price value a determinant of trust in government. In turn, both types of trust are shown to increase user intention to both adopt and use smart-city services. These findings offer city officials an approach to gauging residential intention to use smart-city services, as well as identify those factors critical to developing a successful smart-city strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 623
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Smart city technologies from the perspective of technology acceptance
    Dirsehan, Taskin
    van Zoonen, Liesbet
    [J]. IET SMART CITIES, 2022, 4 (03) : 197 - 210
  • [2] Factors influencing residents' acceptance (support) of remediation technologies
    Prior, Jason
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 624 : 1369 - 1386
  • [3] Factors Affecting Stakeholder Acceptance of a Malaysian Smart City
    Hamamurad, Qasim Hamakhurshid
    Jusoh, Normal Mat
    Ujang, Uznir
    [J]. SMART CITIES, 2022, 5 (04): : 1508 - 1535
  • [4] Moral Values as Factors for Social Acceptance of Smart Grid Technologies
    Milchram, Christine
    van de Kaa, Geerten
    Doorn, Neelke
    Kunneke, Rolf
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [5] The Acceptance Factors of Smart Home Technologies: The Case of Croatian Households
    Etinger, Darko
    Jeger, Lorena
    Babic, Snjezana
    [J]. ADVANCES IN USABILITY, USER EXPERIENCE, WEARABLE AND ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, AHFE 2021, 2021, 275 : 512 - 518
  • [6] City Management Support and Smart City Strategy as Success Factors in Adopting Big Data Technologies for Smart Cities
    Pivar, Jasmina
    [J]. SMART GOVERNMENTS, REGIONS AND CITIES, 2020, : 167 - 183
  • [7] Smart City: Technologies and Challenges
    Law, Kincho H.
    Lynch, Jerome P.
    [J]. IT PROFESSIONAL, 2019, 21 (06) : 46 - 50
  • [8] Visualization in Smart City Technologies
    Cepero, Teresa
    Montane-Jimenez, Luis G.
    Benitez-Guerrero, Edgard
    Mezura-Godoy, Carmen
    [J]. SMART CITIES (ICSC-CITIES 2021), 2022, 1555 : 86 - 100
  • [9] Influential factors to residential building Occupants? acceptance and adoption of smart energy technologies in Denmark
    Billanes, Joy
    Enevoldsen, Peter
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 276
  • [10] What factors determine therapists' acceptance of new technologies for rehabilitation - a study using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)
    Liu, Lili
    Miguel Cruz, Antonio
    Rios Rincon, Adriana
    Buttar, Vickie
    Ranson, Quentin
    Goertzen, Darrell
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (05) : 447 - 455