Conflicts and ecological footprint in MENA countries: implications for sustainable terrestrial ecosystem

被引:34
|
作者
Usman, Ojonugwa [1 ]
Rafindadi, Abdulkadir Abdulrashid [2 ]
Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu [3 ]
机构
[1] Fed Coll Educ Tech, Sch Business Educ, Potiskum, Yobe State, Nigeria
[2] Usmanu Danfodiyo Univ, Fac Social Sci, Dept Econ, Sokoto, Nigeria
[3] Nord Univ Business Sch HHN, Post Box 1490, N-8049 Bodo, Norway
关键词
Conflicts; Panel quantile; Environmental sustainability; Ecological footprint; MENA countries; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; RENEWABLE ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; TRADE OPENNESS; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; CARBON EMISSIONS; REAL GDP; URBANIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-14931-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conflicts are socio-political pressures that alter wellbeing, social structure, and economic sustenance. However, very limited studies have assessed the long-term impact of conflicts on environmental sustainability. This study investigates the role of internal and external conflicts on ecological footprint in the Middle East and North African countries (MENA) over the period 1995-2016. Here, we test whether the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis is valid for MENA countries during the period of internal and external conflicts-characterized by energy disasters and deteriorating income levels. Using robust econometric tools based on 12 MENA countries, the results show that income growth has negative impact with evidence of inherent heterogeneity across quantile distribution of ecological footprint. However, the positive impact of the square term of income decreases ecological footprint, thus, confirming U-shaped relationship between income and environmental indicator across MENA countries. The results further show that excessive energy consumption is attributed to a rising level of urbanization, while increase in conflicts stimulates environmental degradation. These findings are essential for effective conflict resolution and environmental policies across conflict-prone countries.
引用
收藏
页码:59988 / 59999
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conflicts and ecological footprint in MENA countries: implications for sustainable terrestrial ecosystem
    Ojonugwa Usman
    Abdulkadir Abdulrashid Rafindadi
    Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 59988 - 59999
  • [2] Ecological Footprint and Its Determinants in MENA Countries: A Spatial Econometric Approach
    Ramezani, Mohammadreza
    Abolhassani, Leili
    Foroushani, Naser Shahnoushi
    Burgess, Diane
    Aminizadeh, Milad
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [3] Natural Resource Abundance, Renewable Energy, and Ecological Footprint Linkage in MENA Countries
    Nathaniel, Solomon Prince
    Adeleye, Ngozi
    Adedoyin, Festus Fatai
    ESTUDIOS DE ECONOMIA APLICADA, 2021, 39 (03):
  • [4] Human well-being versus ecological footprint in MENA countries: A trade-off?
    Kassouri, Yacouba
    Altintas, Halil
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 263
  • [5] The Ecological Footprint of Industrialized countries
    Frassoldati, Irene
    IN BO-RICERCHE E PROGETTI PER IL TERRITORIO LA CITTA E L ARCHITETTURA, 2014, 5 (07): : 191 - 196
  • [6] Ecological footprint and sustainable tourism
    Chavez Dagostino, Rosa Maria
    Cifuentes Lemus, Juan Luis
    Andrade Romo, Edmundo
    Espinoza Sanchez, Rodrigo
    TEORIA Y PRAXIS, 2006, 2 (02): : 147 - 156
  • [7] Digital economy, resource richness, external conflicts, and ecological footprint: Evidence from emerging countries
    Dai, Siwei
    Su, Mengying
    Liu, Yandong
    Xu, Zhaoyi
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 85
  • [9] Ecological footprint of Taiwan: A discussion of its implications for urban and rural sustainable development
    Wang, Ben-Chaung
    Chou, Fang-Yi
    Lee, Yung-Jaan
    COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2012, 36 (04) : 342 - 349
  • [10] Ecological Footprint: Implications for biodiversity
    Galli, Alessandro
    Wackernagel, Mathis
    Iha, Katsunori
    Lazarus, Elias
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 173 : 121 - 132