共 50 条
Prevalence of Pre-Diabetes across Ethnicities: A Review of Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) and Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) for Classification of Dysglycaemia
被引:109
|作者:
Yip, Wilson C. Y.
[1
,2
]
Sequeira, Ivana R.
[1
,2
]
Plank, Lindsay D.
[3
]
Poppitt, Sally D.
[1
,2
,4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Auckland, Human Nutr Unit, Sch Biol Sci, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
[2] High Value Nutr Natl Sci Challenge, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
[3] Univ Auckland, Dept Surg, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
[4] Univ Auckland, Dept Med, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
来源:
关键词:
obesity;
type;
2;
diabetes;
prediabetes;
fasting plasma glucose;
oral glucose tolerance test;
impaired glucose tolerance;
impaired fasting glucose;
ethnicity;
MUSCLE INSULIN-RESISTANCE;
RISK-FACTORS;
DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA;
CARDIOMETABOLIC RISK;
SOUTH ASIANS;
ECTOPIC FAT;
110;
MG/DL;
SENSITIVITY;
CHINESE;
INTERVENTION;
D O I:
10.3390/nu9111273
中图分类号:
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生];
TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号:
100403 ;
摘要:
Prediabetes can be defined by the presence of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or glycated haemoglobin (Hb(A1c)) to identify individuals at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D). The World Health Organization (WHO, 1999) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA, 2003) utilise different cut-off values for IFG (WHO: 6.1-6.9 mmol/L; ADA: 5.6-6.9 mmol/L) but the same cut-off values for IGT (7.8-11.0 mmol/L). This review investigates whether there are differences in prevalence of IFG, IGT, and combined IFG&IGT between ethnicities, in particular Asian Chinese and European Caucasians. In total, we identified 19 studies using the WHO1999 classification, for which the average proportional prevalence for isolated (i)-IFG, i-IGT, and combined IFG&IGT were 43.9%, 41.0%, and 13.5%, respectively, for Caucasian and 29.2%, 49.4%, and 18.2%, respectively, for Asian. For the 14 studies using ADA(2003) classification, the average proportional i-IFG, i-IGT, and combined IFG&IGT prevalences were 58.0%, 20.3%, and 19.8%, respectively, for Caucasian; 48.1%, 27.7%, and 20.5%, respectively, for Asian. Whilst not statistically different, there may be clinically relevant differences in the two populations, with our observations for both classifications indicating that prevalence of i-IFG is higher in Caucasian cohorts whilst i-IGT and combined IFG&IGT are both higher in Asian cohorts.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文