A Comprehensive Evaluation Method on Dynamic Simulation Accuracy of Power System

被引:6
|
作者
Zheng, Huiping [1 ]
Xue, Min [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Yan
Liu, Xinyuan [1 ]
Han, Yu
机构
[1] Shanxi Elect Power Res Inst, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[2] NARI Grp Corp, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
dynamic simulation; accuracy degree of simulation; credibility index; power system;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.541-542.869
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In order to overcome the shortcomings of the present accuracy assessment methods of power system dynamic simulation, this paper focuses the permanent single phase short-circuit fault which occurs in a large probability in power grids, and selects the typical electrical quantities which is very concerned in engineering after the fault happened. A time-scale based error criteria on simulation validation is proposed, and a comprehensive error criteria according to the average errors between simulation data and actual data is proposed to evaluate objectively the simulation accuracy of the typical electrical quantities. Considering the variation characteristics of the electrical quantities, the simulation accuracy evaluation of a single electrical element is expended to the simulation accuracy evaluation of the entire network, so not only the comprehensive evaluation about the model and its parameters but also the information for model modification and parameter correction can be obtained. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by the numerical results on the New England 10 Unit 39 Bus powers system.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comprehensive evaluation and analysis system for accuracy of power system state estimation
    Zhang, Jing
    Bi, Tianshu
    Liu, Hao
    Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control, 2024, 52 (20): : 12 - 24
  • [2] Application of dynamic comprehensive evaluation method in power system emergency management capability assessment
    Wang D.
    Cai D.
    Fang X.
    Fang Z.
    Hu Z.
    Ding P.
    Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control, 2019, 47 (16): : 101 - 107
  • [3] Study of the credibility evaluation method for the power system simulation
    Jia, Xu-Dong
    Li, Geng-Yin
    Zhao, Cheng-Yong
    Xiao, Xiang-Ning
    Han, Wei-Qiang
    Guo, Qi
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2010, 30 (19): : 51 - 57
  • [4] Comprehensive dynamic analysis method for power system static voltage stability
    Liu, Guangye
    Shi, Hailiang
    Yang, Yihan
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2013, 33 (10): : 50 - 56
  • [5] Quantitative evaluation of parameter uncertainty in power system dynamic simulation
    Chen, Jianhua
    Wu, Wenchuan
    Zhang, Boming
    Wu, Shuangxi
    Dianwang Jishu/Power System Technology, 2010, 34 (11): : 18 - 23
  • [6] Method of Evaluating Dynamic Accuracy of Five-axis Machine Tool Based on Test Piece and Comprehensive Evaluation System
    Song, Shijie
    Dai, Xiaolin
    Li, Xiaoning
    Gong, Dawei
    SENSORS AND MATERIALS, 2020, 32 (04) : 1185 - 1207
  • [7] A COMPREHENSIVE LONG-TERM DYNAMIC SIMULATION FOR POWER-SYSTEM RECOVERY
    ROYTELMAN, I
    SHAHIDEHPOUR, SM
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1994, 9 (03) : 1427 - 1433
  • [8] A Fast Method for Uncertainty Analysis of Power System Dynamic Simulation
    Liu, Chengxi
    Jiang, Youjin
    Bai, Hao
    Yao, Ruotian
    Wu, Lifang
    Yang, Weichen
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (07)
  • [9] A Validation Method for Power System Dynamic Simulation Software Based on Hybrid Simulation
    Wu, Shuangxi
    Wu, Wenchuan
    Zhang, Boming
    2012 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2012,
  • [10] Post-evaluation Index System and Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Daily Power System Dispatching
    Cui, Pengcheng
    Xu, Bing
    Wen, Fushuan
    Fu, Zihao
    Zhu, Bingquan
    Ni, Qiulong
    Singh, S. N.
    ADVANCES IN ENERGY AND POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 508 : 73 - 86