Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle in Thailand and China: Evidence from the ARDL Bounds Testing

被引:2
|
作者
Ruankham, Warawut [1 ]
Pongpruttikul, Phoommhiphat [2 ]
机构
[1] Mae Fah Luang Univ, Sch Management, Off Border Econ & Logist Study OBELS, 333 M-1, Muang Chiag Rai 57100, Chiang Rai, Thailand
[2] Dhurakij Pundit Univ, Res Dev & Innovat RDI, Bangkok, Thailand
来源
关键词
Feldstein Horioka Puzzle; ARDL Bounds Testing; Cointegration; Saving; Investment; INVESTMENT; COINTEGRATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no9.0001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study aimed to investigate the existence of the Feldstein-Horioka (1980) puzzle in international macroeconomics by applying the conditional Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model to examine the long-run relationship between national savings and investments in Thailand and China. The input of this study relied on annual national savings and investments as a fraction of GDP during 1980-2019 which was collected from China National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and Thailand National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC). Hypothetically, Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and Phillips-Perron (PP) unit root tests were applied to test the stationary properties and to investigate the integration level of selected time series. The empirical results, confirmed by cumulative sum (CUSUM) and cumulative sum square (CUSUMSQ), maintained no serial correlation and structural break problems. The finding of this study suggested that the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle in Thailand did not exist significantly. Thailand's national savings and investments nexus was independent, following the classic economic idea that financial liberalization, or perfect capital mobility, allowed national savings and investments to flow freely to countries with better interest rates. Whereas, a strong significant correlation was found in the case of China during the fixed exchange rate regime switching in 1994 and post WTO participation after 2001-2019.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle across EU members: Evidence from the ARDL bounds approach and panel data
    Kollias, Christos
    Mylonidis, Nikolaos
    Paleologou, Suzanna-Maria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2008, 17 (03) : 380 - 387
  • [2] The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle in the presence of structural breaks: evidence from China
    Yildirim, Dilem
    Orman, Ethem Erdem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2018, 23 (03) : 374 - 392
  • [3] Revisit Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: evidence from Malaysia
    Tang, Chor Foon
    Lean, Hooi Hooi
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2011, 31 (03): : 2237 - 2249
  • [4] Testing the validity of the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle for Australia
    Kumar, Saten
    Webber, Don J.
    Fargher, Scott
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2012, 44 (05) : 599 - 605
  • [5] Testing the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle in CEE Countries
    Kersan-Skabic, Ines
    [J]. ROLE OF FINANCIAL SECTOR IN SUPPORTING THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY OF CEE COUNTRIES, 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CURRENCY, BANKING AND INTERNATIONAL FINANCE, 2014, : 178 - 188
  • [6] TESTING THE VALIDITY OF THE FELDSTEIN-HORIOKA PUZZLE FOR CROATIA
    Josic, Hrvoje
    Josic, Mislav
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2012, 25 (03): : 580 - 599
  • [7] Globalization and the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle
    Younas, Javed
    Chakraborty, Debasish
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2011, 43 (16) : 2089 - 2096
  • [8] The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle revisited
    Sachsida, A
    Caetano, MAR
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2000, 68 (01) : 85 - 88
  • [9] The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle revisited
    Ho, TW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2002, 21 (04) : 555 - 564
  • [10] Is the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle history?
    Coakley, J
    Fuertes, AM
    Spagnolo, F
    [J]. MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 2004, 72 (05): : 569 - 590