A battery centralized scheduling strategy for battery swapping of electric vehicles

被引:18
|
作者
Li, Congbo [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Ningbo [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Yi, Qian [1 ,2 ]
Qi, Dongfeng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Coll Mech & Vehicle Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, State Key Lab Mech Transmiss, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Electric vehicles; Battery swapping scenario; Charging load; Battery purchase costs; Scheduling strategy; MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; OPERATION; STATIONS; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2022.104327
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Electric vehicles (EVs) have been substantially favored by consumers in recent years. However, long charging time, high battery purchase costs (BPC), and large charging load limit the development of EVs. The battery swapping scenario could solve the above problems well. This paper presents a battery centralized scheduling strategy (BCSS) in the battery swap scenario, which significantly reduces BPC and battery charging peak load (BCPL). Based on the presented BCSS, an optimization model of BPC considering BCPL is established. Then, the genetic algorithm (GA) is used to drive the optimization process and 1000 private battery swaps EVs are employed to simulate the BCSS in the prescribed battery swapping scenario. The optimization results suggest that the BPC of the BCSS is 4.15 million yuan, and the BCPL is 2418 kW. In the same situation, compared with the equal time interval transportation strategy (ETITS) and the equal number of batteries transportation strategy (ENBTS), the BPC of the BCSS is reduced by 24.7% and 9.5%, respectively. In addition, when the number of transportation increases, the battery purchase cost shows a decreasing trend, while BCPL indicates an increasing trend.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Centralized Charging Strategy and Scheduling Algorithm for Electric Vehicles Under a Battery Swapping Scenario
    Kang, Qi
    Wang, JiaBao
    Zhou, MengChu
    Ammari, Ahmed Chiheb
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2016, 17 (03) : 659 - 669
  • [2] Optimal Scheduling for Hybrid Battery Swapping System of Electric Vehicles
    Wang, Ziqi
    Hou, Sizu
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [3] Joint charging scheduling of electric vehicles with battery to grid technology in battery swapping station
    Ding, Ran
    Liu, Zhizhen
    Li, Xianglin
    Hou, Yanjin
    Sun, Weize
    Zhai, Huiqiang
    Wei, Xiaozhao
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 872 - 882
  • [4] Optimal Scheduling of Battery Charging Station Serving Electric Vehicles Based on Battery Swapping
    Tan, Xiaoqi
    Qu, Guannan
    Sun, Bo
    Li, Na
    Tsang, Danny H. K.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2019, 10 (02) : 1372 - 1384
  • [5] A Mobile Battery Swapping Service for Electric Vehicles Based on a Battery Swapping Van
    Shao, Sujie
    Guo, Shaoyong
    Qiu, Xuesong
    ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (10):
  • [6] Infrastructure Planning for Electric Vehicles with Battery Swapping
    Mak, Ho-Yin
    Rong, Ying
    Shen, Zuo-Jun Max
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (07) : 1557 - 1575
  • [7] Battery swapping scheduling for electric vehicles: a non-cooperative game approach
    Zhang, Yu
    Han, Tao
    He, Wei
    Xia, Jianhua
    Cui, Lichao
    Ma, Zuofu
    Liu, Shiwei
    Frontiers in Energy Research, 2024, 12
  • [8] An optimal battery allocation model for battery swapping station of electric vehicles
    Yang, Jie
    Liu, Wei
    Ma, Kai
    Yue, Zhiyuan
    Zhu, Anhu
    Guo, Shiliang
    ENERGY, 2023, 272
  • [9] Centralized charging and dispatching strategy for battery swapping of electric vehicles considering pressure energy absorption of natural gas pipe network
    Wang Y.
    Xiang Y.
    Huang Y.
    Liu J.
    Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2022, 42 (10): : 167 - 176
  • [10] Battery swapping station for electric vehicles: opportunities and challenges
    Ahmad, Furkan
    Saad Alam, Mohammad
    Saad Alsaidan, Ibrahim
    Shariff, Samir M.
    IET SMART GRID, 2020, 3 (03) : 280 - 286