Comparison of a virtual reality compression-only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) course to the traditional course with content validation of the VR course - A randomized control pilot study

被引:14
|
作者
Hubail, Dalal [1 ]
Mondal, Ankita [1 ]
Al Jabir, Ahmed [1 ]
Patel, Bijendra [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Barts Canc Inst, London, England
[2] Royal London Hosp, Upper Gastrointestinal Surg, London, England
来源
关键词
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); Virtual reality (VR); Skill acquisition; Content validation; SKILLS; INSTRUCTION; RETENTION; EDUCATION; SIMULATOR; SURVIVAL; FEEDBACK; QUALITY; TOOL; CD;
D O I
10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103241
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Technology has been a major contributor to recent changes in education, where simulation plays a huge role by providing a unique safe environment, especially with the recent incorporation of immersive virtual reality (VR) training. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is said to double, even triple survival from cardiac arrest, and hence it is crucial to ensure optimal acquisition and retention of these skills. In this study, we aim to compare a VR CPR teaching program to current teaching methods with content validation of the VR course. Methods: A randomized single-blinded simulation-based pilot study where 26 participants underwent baseline assessment of their CPR skills using a validated checklist and Laerdal QCPR (R). Participants were randomly allocated and underwent their respective courses. This was followed by a final assessment and a questionnaire for content validation, knowledge and confidence. The data was analysed using STATA 16.2 to determine the standardized mean difference using paired and unpaired t-test. Results: Subjective assessment using the checklist showed statistically significant improvement in the overall scores of both groups (traditional group mean improved from 6.92 to 9.61 p-value 0.0005, VR group from 6.61 to 8.53 p-value 0.0016). However, no statistically significant difference was noted between the final scores in both the subjective and objective assessments. As for the questionnaire, knowledge and confidence seemed to improve equally. Finally, the content validation showed statistically significant improvement in ease of use (mean score 3 to 4.23 p-value of 0.0144), while for content, positivity of experience, usefulness and appropriateness participants showed similar satisfaction before and after use. Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that VR teaching could deliver CPR skills in an attractive manner, with no inferiority in acquisition of these skills compared to traditional methods. To corroborate these findings, we suggest a follow-up study with a larger sample size after adding ventilation and Automated External Defibrillator (AED) skills to the VR course with re-examination after 3-6 months to test retention of the skills.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Compression-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator Course for Primary School Students: A Malaysian Pilot Study
    Fariduddin, Muhamad Nur
    Mohamed, Mawarni
    Jaafar, Mohd Johar
    Baharin, Kamarul
    Siau, Ching Sin
    Bashah, Kamal
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [2] Brief compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator course for secondary school students: a multischool feasibility study
    So, Kit Ying
    Ko, Hiu Fai
    Tsui, Cindy Sin Yui
    Yeung, Chi Yeung
    Chu, Yee Ching
    Lai, Veronica Ka Wai
    Lee, Anna
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):