Grade 2 chondrosarcoma: Stage I or stage II tumor?

被引:21
|
作者
Reith, JD
Horodyski, MB
Scarborough, MT
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Pathol Immunol & Lab Med, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.blo.0000093895.12372.cl
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
We analyzed chondrosarcomas of bone to assess whether Grade 2 tumors are more appropriately grouped with Grade 1 chondrosarcomas or Grade 3 and dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Stage I or Stage II). A retrospective chart review identified 109 patients who presented with nonmetastatic chondrosarcoma. Data were gathered on each tumor's histologic grade, extent (intracompartmental versus extra-compartmental), resection margin status, and site (axial versus appendicular). The cohort included 60 males and 49 females with a mean age of 50 years. Forty tumors were located in the axial skeleton and the remainder were distributed throughout the appendicular skeleton. Fifty-three tumors were Grade 1, 40 tumors were Grade 2, eight tumors were Grade 3, and eight tumors were dedifferentiated. Statistical analysis established grade as the only significant variable for this group of patients; extracompartmental tumor spread also correlated with outcome, but not independent of the grade. Margin status and site were not statistically significant with respect to outcome. Chi square analysis also established that Grade 2 tumors are grouped more appropriately with the Grade 1 chondrosarcomas as Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Stage I neoplasms. These data should he considered when developing the surgical plan, particularly for patients with Grade 2 appendicular chondrosarcomas.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 51
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Grade II chondrosarcoma: Indolent or aggressive tumor?
    Reith, JD
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 15 (01) : 22A - 22A
  • [2] Grade II chondrosarcoma: Indolent or aggressive tumor?
    Reith, JD
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2002, 82 (01) : 22A - 22A
  • [3] Tumor grade is an important determinant of survival in stage II endometrial cancer
    Mourton, S. M.
    Xing, G. B.
    Fowler, W.
    Leiserowitz, G. S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (02) : S93 - S93
  • [4] A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF STAGE-I AND STAGE-II UTERINE PAPILLARY SEROUS CARCINOMA WITH STAGE-I AND STAGE-II FIGO GRADE-III ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA
    SAVILO, E
    DAYA, D
    OCONNELL, G
    GOODYEAR, M
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1993, 68 (01) : A78 - A78
  • [5] Iron augments stage-I and stage-II tumor promotion in murine skin
    Bhasin, G
    Kauser, H
    Athar, M
    CANCER LETTERS, 2002, 183 (02) : 113 - 122
  • [6] INFLUENCE OF TREATMENT AND TUMOR GRADE ON THE PROGNOSIS OF STAGE-II CARCINOMA OF THE ENDOMETRIUM
    PREMPREE, T
    PATANAPHAN, V
    SALAZAR, OM
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA ONCOLOGY, 1982, 21 (04): : 225 - 229
  • [7] Contemporary Management of Stage I and Stage II Seminoma
    Chung, P.
    Sridharan, S.
    Jewett, M.
    Bedard, P.
    Atenafu, E.
    Moore, M.
    Sweet, J.
    O'Malley, M.
    Anson-Cartwright, L.
    Warde, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S84 - S85
  • [8] TREATMENT OF STAGE-I AND STAGE-II ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE BREAST BY TUMOR-EXCISION AND IRRADIATION
    BEDWINEK, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1981, 7 (11): : 1553 - 1559
  • [9] Commentary on: Nomograms based on inflammatory biomarkers for predicting tumor grade and microvascular invasion in stage I/II hepatocellular carcinoma
    Xiao, Liang
    Zeng, Furong
    Deng, Guangtong
    BIOSCIENCE REPORTS, 2019, 39
  • [10] Serum Tumor Markers in Stage I-II Breast Cancer
    Tozzoli, Renato
    D'Aurizio, Federica
    Falcomer, Flavio
    Basso, Stefano M. M.
    Lumachi, Franco
    MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 12 (03) : 285 - 289