Feed additives decrease survival of delta coronavirus in nursery pig diets

被引:15
|
作者
Cottingim, Katie M. [1 ]
Verma, Harsha [2 ]
Urriola, Pedro E. [1 ]
Sampedro, Fernando [2 ]
Shurson, Gerald C. [1 ]
Goyal, Sagar M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Anim Sci, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Vet Populat Med, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
Feed additives; Inactivation kinetics; Porcine delta coronavirus; Survival; Swine; Transmission; Virus; ESCHERICHIA-COLI O157-H7; FUMARIC-ACID; SALMONELLA; INACTIVATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s40813-016-0048-8
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Background: Feed contaminated with feces from infected pigs is believed to be a potential route of transmission of porcine delta coronavirus (PDCoV). The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of commercial feed additives (e.i., acids, salt and sugar) to swine feed can be an effective strategy to inactive PDCoV. Results: Six commercial feed acids (UltraAcid P, Activate DA, KEMGEST, Acid Booster, Luprosil, and Amasil), salt, and sugar were evaluated. The acids were added at the recommended concentrations to 5 g aliquots of complete feed, which were also inoculated with 1 mL of PDCoV and incubated for 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days. In another experiment, double the recommended concentrations of these additives were also added to the feed samples and incubated for 0, 1, 3, 7, and 10 days. All samples were stored at room temperature (similar to 25 degrees C) followed by removal of aliquots at 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days. Any surviving virus was eluted in a buffer solution and then titrated in swine testicular cells. Feed samples without any additive were used as controls. Both Weibull and log-linear kinetic models were used to analyze virus survival curves. The presence of a tail in the virus inactivation curves indicated deviations from the linear behavior and hence, the Weibull model was chosen for characterizing the inactivation responses due to the better fit. At recommended concentrations, delta values (days to decrease virus concentration by 1 log) ranged from 0.62-1.72 days, but there were no differences on virus survival among feed samples with or without additives at the manufacturers recommended concentrations. Doubling the concentration of the additives reduced the delta value to <= 0.28 days (P < 0.05) for all the additives except for Amasil (delta values of 0.86 vs. 4.95 days). Feed additives that contained phosphoric acid, citric acid, or fumaric acid were the most effective in reducing virus survival, although none of the additives completely inactivated the virus by 10-days post-inoculation. Conclusions: Commercial feed additives (acidifiers and salt) may be utilized as a strategy to decrease risk of PDCoV in feed, specially, commercial feed acidifiers at double the recommended concentrations reduced PDCoV survival in complete feed during storage at room temperature. However, none of these additives completely inactivated the virus.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feed additives decrease survival of delta coronavirus in nursery pig diets
    Katie M. Cottingim
    Harsha Verma
    Pedro E. Urriola
    Fernando Sampedro
    Gerald C. Shurson
    Sagar M. Goyal
    [J]. Porcine Health Management, 3
  • [2] Alternatives to the use of antimicrobial feed additives in nursery diets: A pilot study
    Ragland, D
    Schneider, JL
    Amass, SF
    Hill, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2006, 14 (02): : 82 - 88
  • [3] Young Scholar Presentation: Using an integrated systems biology platform to determine the mode of action of feed additives in nursery pig diets
    Trudeau, Michaela
    Tran, Huyen
    de Rodas, Brenda
    Karnezos, Theodore
    Gomez, Andres
    Chen, Chi
    Urriola, Pedro E.
    Shurson, Gerald C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 93 - 93
  • [4] Herbal extracts and organic acids as natural feed additives in pig diets
    Costa, L. B.
    Luciano, F. B.
    Miyada, V. S.
    Gois, F. D.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 43 (02) : 181 - 193
  • [5] Effect of lactation and nursery diets supplemented with a feed flavor on sow feed intake and lactation performance and subsequent weaned pig nursery performance
    Spinler, Mikayla S.
    Gebhardt, Jordan T.
    Tokach, Mike D.
    Goodband, Robert D.
    DeRouchey, Joel M.
    Kyle, Josh M.
    Woodworth, Jason C.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [6] FEED ADDITIVES IN TURKEY DIETS
    CHARLES, OW
    [J]. FEEDSTUFFS, 1976, 48 (02): : 42 - &
  • [7] Feed additives in feedlot diets
    Barducci, R. S.
    Sarti, L. M.
    Millen, D. D.
    Pacheco, R. D. L.
    Baldin, S. R.
    Parra, F. S.
    Putarov, T. C.
    Martins, C. L.
    Arrigoni, M. D. B.
    [J]. ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2013, 65 (06) : 1593 - 1602
  • [8] EXAMINATION OF FEED-ADDITIVES AND SLURRY-ADDITIVES FOR DECREASE OF AMMONIA EMISSIONS FROM PIG KEEPING
    KRIEGER, R
    PFEIFFER, A
    [J]. DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1995, 102 (08): : 316 - 320
  • [9] The effects of deoxynivalenol-contaminated corn dried distillers grains with solubles in nursery pig diets and potential for mitigation by commercially available feed additives
    Frobose, H. L.
    Fruge, E. D.
    Tokach, M. D.
    Hansen, E. L.
    DeRouchey, J. M.
    Dritz, S. S.
    Goodband, R. D.
    Nelssen, J. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (03) : 1074 - 1088
  • [10] Phytogenic feed additive improved growth performance and health of nursery pigs in diets with and without combination of several feed additives
    May, Sabrina
    Vega, Caroline Gonzalez
    Smith, Brooke
    Moran, Kory
    Teddy, Ellyn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 138 - 139