Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?

被引:36
|
作者
Andolfi, Ciro [1 ,3 ]
Adamic, Brittany [1 ]
Oommen, Jerry [2 ]
Gundeti, Mohan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Comer Childrens Hosp, Pediat Urol,Sect Urol,Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Coll Osteopath Med, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Univ Chicago Med, MacLean Ctr Clin Med Eth, Comer Childrens Hosp, Sect Adult & Pediat Urol,Dept Surg,Ctr Simulat, 5841 S Maryland Ave,Rm J-664, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
Pediatric urology; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction; Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty; Robotic pyeloplasty; Laparoscopic pyeloplasty; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; HYNES DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY; SURGERY; LONG; METAANALYSIS; STANDARD; YOUNGER; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-019-02943-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Open pyeloplasty (OP) has been the first-line treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) since it was first described by Anderson and Hynes. The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat UPJO in the pediatric population has increased in recent years, due to decreased morbidity and shorter recovery times. Recently, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) has seen a steady expansion. Unlike laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP), RALP comes with a more manageable learning curve aided by specialized technological advantages such as high-resolution three-dimensional view, tremor filtration with motion scaling, and highly dexterous wrist-like instruments. With this review, we aim to highlight the trend toward robotic pyeloplasty over laparoscopy and current available evidence on outcomes. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases, and we critically reviewed the available literature on the use of laparoscopy and robotic technology in pediatric patients with UPJO. Results Overall, we selected 19 original articles and 5 meta-analyses. The available literature showed that the robotic approach to the UPJO allowed for decreased operative times, shorter length of hospital stay, lower complication rates, with success rates comparable to LP. Conflicting results persist regarding robotic platform and equipment costs. Conclusion While laparoscopy requires advanced skills for complex reconstructive procedures, such as pyeloplasty, robot-assisted surgery offers the valuable potential of making MIS more accessible to these types of procedure. Robotic technology has contributed to shortening the learning curve by acting as a bridge between open and endoscopic approach. There is still a strong need for higher quality evidence in the form of prospective observational studies and clinical trials, as well as further cost-effectiveness analyses. As robotic surgical technology spreads, future systems will be developed, offering smaller and more flexible tools, allowing enhanced applications on pediatric patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1827 / 1833
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?
    Ciro Andolfi
    Brittany Adamic
    Jerry Oommen
    Mohan S. Gundeti
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 1827 - 1833
  • [2] Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted pyeloplasty in infants and young children
    Sun, Long
    Zhao, Dongyan
    Shen, Yiding
    Tang, Daxing
    Chen, Guangjie
    Zhu, Linfeng
    Yang, Yang
    Tao, Chang
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (02) : 868 - 873
  • [3] Robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty
    Ignacio Pascual-Piedrola, Juan
    Merino-Narro, Imanol
    Hevia-Suarez, Mateo
    Javier Ancizu-Viarckert, Francisco
    Garcia-Cortes, Angel
    Domenech-Lopez, Pablo
    [J]. ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2017, 70 (04): : 454 - 461
  • [4] A comparative study of pediatric open pyeloplasty, laparoscopy-assisted extracorporeal pyeloplasty, and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty
    Song, Sang Hoon
    Lee, Chanwoo
    Jung, Jaeyoon
    Kim, Sung Jin
    Park, Sungchan
    Park, Hyungkeun
    Kim, Kun Suk
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04):
  • [5] A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants
    Chandrasekharam, V. V. S.
    Babu, Ramesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2021, 17 (04) : 502 - 510
  • [6] The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children
    Zhou, Lijun
    Huang, Jin
    Xie, Hua
    Chen, Fang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [7] Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review
    Masieri, Lorenzo
    Sforza, Simone
    Grosso, Antonio A.
    Valastro, Francesca
    Tellini, Riccardo
    Cini, Chiara
    Landi, Luca
    Taverna, Maria
    Elia, Antonio
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Minervini, Andrea
    Carini, Marco
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (06) : 673 - 690
  • [8] Meta-analysis of robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children
    Cundy, Thomas P.
    Harling, Leanne
    Hughes-Hallett, Archie
    Mayer, Erik K.
    Najmaldin, Azad S.
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Yang, Guang-Zhong
    Darzi, Ara
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (04) : 582 - 594
  • [9] Robot-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty
    蒋绍博
    [J]. 外科研究与新技术, 2005, (03) : 201 - 201
  • [10] Robot-assisted laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Childhood
    Lorenz, Judith
    [J]. AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2021, 52 (06) : 510 - 510