The Influence of Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Wound Infection and on the Colonization of Wound Drains in Patients After Correction of Craniosynostosis

被引:4
|
作者
Holle, Johannes [1 ]
Finger, Tobias [2 ]
Lugonja, Julia [3 ]
Schmidt, Florian [3 ]
Schaumann, Andreas [2 ]
Gratopp, Alexander [3 ]
Thomale, Ulrich-Wilhelm [2 ]
von Bernuth, Horst [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Schulz, Matthias [2 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Pediat Gastroenterol Nephrol & Metab Dis, Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Pediat Neurosurg, Berlin, Germany
[3] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Pediat Pulmonol Immunol & Intens Care Med, Berlin, Germany
[4] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin Inst Hlth Ctr Regenerat Therapies BCRT, Berlin, Germany
[5] Lab Berlin GmbH, Dept Immunol, Berlin, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS | 2021年 / 9卷
关键词
perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis; wound infection; craniosynostoses; surgery; antibiotic stewardship; drain colonization; PREVALENCE; GUIDELINES; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fped.2021.720074
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: Evidence for the duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) after the correction of craniosynostosis in children is scarce. We evaluated the necessary duration of PAP to ensure a minimal rate of postoperative wound infections. Methods: In this monocentric, retrospective, and prospective pilot study, two PAP protocols were compared. From August 2017 to May 2018, treatment group 1 (TG 1) was treated using the standard PAP protocol with at least three doses of antibiotics. Between May 2018 and March 2019, a shortened PAP with a single-shot administration was given to treatment group 2 (TG 2a and b). Endpoints of this study were wound infection rate, colonization rate of wound drains, and the course of treatment reflected by clinical and laboratory data. Results: A cohort of 187 children underwent craniosynostosis correction: 167 were treated according to protocols--95 patients with at least three doses (TG 1) and 72 patients with a single-shot of cefuroxime (TG 2a). Baseline characteristics were similar for both groups. We could not detect significant differences, neither for wound infection rates (TG 1: 1.1%, TG 2a: 0.0%, p = 0.38) nor for colonization rates of wound drains (TG 1: 4.8%, TG 2a: 10.5%, p = 0.27). Conclusions: Single-shot PAP had no adverse effects on the wound infection rate or the colonization rate of the wound drains compared with prolonged perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. As a result, single-shot preoperative PAP is now applied to the majority craniosynostosis patients undergoing surgical correction in our unit.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discordance Between Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Wound Infection Cultures in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Fong, Zhi Ven
    McMillan, Matthew T.
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Sahora, Klaus
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    De Pastena, Matteo
    Loehrer, Andrew P.
    Lee, Grace C.
    Ferrone, Cristina R.
    Chang, David C.
    Hutter, Matthew M.
    Drebin, Jeffrey A.
    Bassi, Claudio
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Vollmer, Charles M.
    Fernandez-del Castillo, Carlos
    JAMA SURGERY, 2016, 151 (05) : 432 - 439
  • [2] Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis Indications and Modalities for the Prevention of Postoperative Wound Infection
    Eckmann, Christian
    Aghdassi, Seven Johannes Sam
    Brinkmann, Alexander
    Pletz, Mathias
    Rademacher, Jessica
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 121 (07): : 233 - 242
  • [3] PERIOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS AND THE RISK OF WOUND-INFECTION IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATIONS
    GRUNDMANN, R
    KRAUME, R
    FORTSCHRITTE DER MEDIZIN, 1984, 102 (47-4) : 1199 - 1202
  • [4] PERIOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS AND WOUND-INFECTION FOLLOWING BREAST SURGERY
    PLATT, R
    ZUCKER, JR
    ZALEZNIK, DF
    HOPKINS, CC
    DELLINGER, EP
    KARCHMER, AW
    BRYAN, CS
    BURKE, JF
    WIKLER, MA
    MARINO, SK
    HOLBROOK, KF
    TOSTESON, TD
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 31 : 43 - 48
  • [5] Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing wound infection after breast surgery
    Wertkin, Martin G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (03) : 520 - 520
  • [6] Antibiotic Prophylaxis as a Preventative Wound Infection After Breast Surgery
    Djordjevic, N.
    Budjevac, D.
    Djordjevic, L.
    Karanikolic, A.
    Bojic, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S155 - S155
  • [7] POSTOPERATIVE WOUND INFECTIONS AND PERIOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS
    RODING, H
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1991, 116 (24): : 1391 - 1398
  • [8] Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection
    Barajas-Nava, Leticia A.
    Lopez-Alcalde, Jesus
    Roque i Figuls, Marta
    Sola, Ivan
    Bonfill Cosp, Xavier
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (06):
  • [9] PROPHYLAXIS OF WOUND-INFECTION AFTER ABDOMINAL OPERATIONS - IS ONE DOSE OF ANTIBIOTIC ENOUGH
    POLLOCK, AV
    PICKFORD, IR
    BRENNAN, SS
    EVANS, M
    EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1982, 14 (02) : 118 - 118
  • [10] Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing wound infection after breast surgery: A systematic review and metaanalysis
    Tejirian, Talar
    DiFronzo, L. Andrew
    Haigh, Philip I.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 203 (05) : 729 - 734