Bioabsorbable versus titanium interference screws with hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective randomized trial with 2-year follow-up

被引:51
|
作者
Myers, Peter [1 ]
Logan, Martin [1 ]
Stokes, Andy [1 ]
Boyd, Kevin [1 ]
Watts, Mark [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brisbane Private Hosp, Brisbane Orthopaed & Sports Med Ctr, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; interference screws; hamstring autograft; bioabsorbable;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2008.02.011
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the outcome of hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by use of identically shaped bioabsorbable and titanium interference screws in a randomized trial. Methods: One hundred patients were randomized to have either bioabsorbable or titanium interference screws used for graft tunnel fixation in hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction. Patients were objectively and subjectively assessed preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Radiographs at 12 months postoperatively were also assessed for tunnel width. Results: There were no differences in clinical outcome by use of Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores between the 2 groups at any stage of follow-up to 2 years. Tibial tunnel widths were the same between the 2 groups. There was slightly more tunnel widening in the femur when bioabsorbable interference screws were used. Conclusions: Identically shaped bioabsorbable interference screws and titanium interference screws used for hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction are equally successful up to 2 years postoperatively. Level of Evidence: Level 1, prospective randomized trial with more than 80% follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 823
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bioabsorbable Versus Titanium Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial With 13-Year Follow-up
    Sundaraj, Keran
    Salmon, Lucy J.
    Heath, Emma L.
    Winalski, Carl S.
    Colak, Ceylan
    Vasanji, Amit
    Roe, Justin P.
    Pinczewski, Leo A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (06): : 1316 - 1326
  • [2] Bioabsorbable Versus Titanium Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial With 5-Year Follow-up
    Arama, Yuval
    Salmon, Lucy J.
    Sri-Ram, Kesavan
    Linklater, James
    Roe, Justin P.
    Pinczewski, Leo A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (08): : 1893 - 1901
  • [3] A Randomized Controlled Trial of PEEK Versus Titanium Interference Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With 2-Year Follow-up
    Shumborski, Sarah
    Heath, Emma
    Salmon, Lucy J.
    Roe, Justin P.
    Linklater, James P.
    Facek, Michael
    Pinczewski, Leo A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (10): : 2386 - 2393
  • [4] A prospective randomized comparison of bioabsorbable and titanium anterior cruciate ligament interference screws
    Kaeding, C
    Farr, J
    Kavanaugh, T
    Pedroza, A
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (02): : 147 - 151
  • [5] Outcome of Hamstring Autograft With Preserved Insertions Compared With Free Hamstring Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery at 2-Year Follow-up
    Gupta, Ravi
    Bahadur, Raj
    Malhotra, Anubhav
    Masih, Gladson David
    Sood, Munish
    Gupta, Parmanand
    Mathur, Vivek Kumar
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (12): : 2208 - 2216
  • [6] Prospective randomized comparison of endobutton versus cross-pin femoral fixation in hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2-year follow-up
    Price, Rohan
    Stoney, James
    Brown, Graeme
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 80 (03) : 162 - 165
  • [7] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid interference screws:: MR imaging follow-up
    Bach, FD
    Carlier, RY
    Elis, JB
    Mompoint, DM
    Feydy, A
    Judet, O
    Beaufils, P
    Vallée, C
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (02) : 541 - 550
  • [8] Bracing versus nonbracing in rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized prospective study with 2-year follow-up
    Eva Möller
    Magnus Forssblad
    Leif Hansson
    Peter Wange
    Lars Weidenhielm
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2001, 9 : 102 - 108
  • [9] Bracing versus nonbracing in rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:: a randomized prospective study with 2-year follow-up
    Möller, E
    Forssblad, M
    Hansson, L
    Wange, P
    Weidenhielm, L
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 9 (02) : 102 - 108
  • [10] A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Quadriceps Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Ebert, Jay R.
    Calvert, Nicholas D.
    Radic, Ross
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (03): : 660 - 669