Derived Crop Coefficients for Winter Wheat Using Different Reference Evpotranspiration Estimates Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Er-Raki, S. [1 ]
Chehbouni, A. [2 ]
Ezzahar, J. [3 ]
Khabba, S. [3 ]
Lakhal, E. K. [3 ]
Duchemin, B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cadi Ayyad Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Marrakech 40000, Morocco
[2] CESBIO Ctr Study Biosphere Space, Toulouse, France
[3] FSSM, Dept Phys, Marrakech 40000, Morocco
来源
关键词
Crop water requirement; Eddy covariance; Empirical method; Semi-arid Environment; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; EVAPORATION; IRRIGATION; MODEL; FLUX; ETO;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This paper reports the results of using three empirical methods (Makkink, Priestley-Taylor and Hargreaves) for estimating the reference evapotranspiration (ET0) in the semi-arid region of Tensift Al Haouz, Marrakech (center of Morocco). The Penman-Monteith equation, standardized by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO-PM), is used to evaluate the three empirical methods. The obtained ET0 data were used to estimate crop water requirement (ET) of winter wheat using the crop coefficient (K-c) approach and results were compared with ET measured by the Eddy Covariance technique. The result showed that using the original empirical coefficients a, alpha and C-m in Hargreaves, Priestley-Taylor and Makkink equations, respectively, the Hargreaves method agreed fairly well with FAO-PM method at the test site. Conversely, the Priestley-Taylor and Makkink methods underestimate the ET by about 20 and 18 %. After adjustment of the original values of two parameters alpha and C-m coefficients in Priestley-Taylor and Makkink equations, the underestimation of ET was reduced to 9% and 4% for the Priestley Taylor and Makkink methods, respectively, which led to an improvement of 55% and 76% of the obtained values compared with the original values.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 221
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Different Methods on the Estimation of the Daily Crop Coefficient of Winter Wheat
    Fang, Jingjing
    Wang, Yining
    Jiang, Peng
    Ju, Qin
    Zhou, Chao
    Lu, Yiran
    Gao, Pei
    Sun, Bo
    WATER, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [2] Determination of Crop Coefficients for Flood-Irrigated Winter Wheat in Southern New Mexico Using Three ETo Estimation Methods
    Yang, Hui
    Shukla, Manoj K.
    Gonzalez, Adam
    Yuan, Yusen
    WATER, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [3] Crop coefficients for winter wheat in a sub-humid climate regime
    Kjaersaard, J. H.
    Plauborg, F.
    Mollerup, M.
    Petersen, C. T.
    Hansen, S.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2008, 95 (08) : 918 - 924
  • [4] Improving WISE Crop Evapotranspiration Estimates Using Crop Coefficients Derived from Remote-Sensing Algorithms
    Costa-Filho, Edson
    Chavez, Jose L.
    Andales, Allan A.
    Brown, Ansley J.
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2024, 150 (05)
  • [5] Estimation of PET of wheat crop by different methods
    Naseer-U-Rahman
    Sastri, A. S. R. A. S.
    Patel, S. R.
    JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY, 2008, 10 (02): : 231 - 232
  • [6] Modelling soil water dynamics in winter wheat using different estimates of canopy development
    Heidmann, T
    Thomsen, A
    Schelde, K
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2000, 129 (2-3) : 229 - 243
  • [7] Estimation of evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of winter wheat and summer maize in Yangling Zone
    Chen, Feng
    Cai, Huanjie
    Wang, Jian
    Ma, Haiting
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2006, 22 (05): : 191 - 193
  • [8] Estimating crop coefficients of winter wheat based on canopy spectral vegetation indices
    Luo, Y. (luoyi.cas@hotmail.com), 1600, Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (29):
  • [9] Crop coefficient for irrigated beans derived using three reference evaporation methods
    de Medeiros, GA
    Arruda, FB
    Sakai, E
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2005, 135 (1-4) : 135 - 143
  • [10] Estimates of sensible heat flux of heterogeneous canopy crop using different micrometeorological methods
    Consoli, Simona
    Papa, Rita
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY-RIVISTA ITALIANA DI AGROMETEOROLOGIA, 2012, 17 (02): : 37 - 46