Risk Factors Associated with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss an Outcome of Pre-Implantation Genetic Screening of Affected Couples

被引:2
|
作者
Fatemi, Nayeralsadat [1 ,2 ]
Varkiani, Maryam [2 ,3 ]
Ramezanali, Fariba [4 ]
Babaabasi, Babak [2 ]
Ghaheri, Azadeh [5 ]
Biglari, Alireza [1 ]
Totonchi, Mehdi [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Zanjan Univ Med Sci ZUMS, Sch Med, Dept Genet & Mol Med, POB 45139-53115, Zanjan, Iran
[2] ACECR, Royan Inst Reprod Biomed, Dept Genet, Reprod Biomed Res Ctr, POB 16635-148, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Sci & Culture, Fac Basic Sci & Adv Technol Biol, Dept Mol Genet, Tehran, Iran
[4] ACECR, Royan Inst Reprod Biomed, Reprod Biomed Res Ctr, Dept Endocrinol & Female Infertil, Tehran, Iran
[5] ACECR, Royan Inst Reprod Biomed, Reprod Epidemiol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[6] ACECR, Royan Inst Stem Cell Biol & Technol, Cell Sci Res Ctr, Dept Stem Cells & Dev Biol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Array-CGH; Chromosomal Abnormalities; Recurrent Pregnancy Loss; MISCARRIAGE;
D O I
10.22074/IJFS.2021.137626.1027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a multifactorial disorder which affects up to 5% of couples around the world. Several factors are considered to be involved in RPL; but, the etiology remains unexplained in 35-60% of cases. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of risk factors associated with RPL in a group of our clinic clients, and their pre-implantation genetic screening (PGS) outcome. Materials and Methods: We designed a retrospective descriptive study among, 602 Iranian couples referred to the Royan Reproductive Clinic (Tehran-Iran) from 2006 to 2018. Their karyotyping test and PGS outcomes were analyzed. PGS had been applied by array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) on embryos from these patients. Also, karyotyping test had been performed using standard cytogenetic techniques. Results: G-banding analysis revealed a frequency of 15.61% chromosomal abnormalities in RPL couples. Also, the reciprocal translocations were more frequent (33/1204 cases) compared to the other structural abnormalities. Pregnancy rate per embryo transferred were 50% with array-CGH approach. Conclusion: Our findings could confirm a positive correlation between chromosomal abnormalities and RPL rate. Applying PGS for the RPL couples, leads to improvement of pregnancy success rate.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss - role of pre implantation genetic screening
    Vellanki, V. S.
    Rao, D. G.
    Mantravadi, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 355 - 355
  • [2] IS THERE A ROLE FOR PRE-IMPLANTATION GENETIC SCREENING IN COUPLES WITH MALE FACTOR INFERTILITY?
    Mantravadi, K. C.
    Rao, D. G.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E304 - E304
  • [3] DOES PRE-IMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING FOR ANEUPLOIDY OPTIMISE THE REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOMES INWOMEN WITH IDIOPATHIC RECURRENT PREGNANCY LOSS?
    Mantravadi, Krishna, Sr.
    Mathew, Sherin
    Soorve, Shivanand, Sr.
    Rao, Durga Gedela, Sr.
    Karunakaran, Sandeep, Sr.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E437 - E437
  • [4] Pre-implantation genetic screening among women experiencing recurrent failure of in vitro fertilization
    Hatirnaz, Safak
    Ozer, Alev
    Hatirnaz, Ebru
    Atasever, Melahat
    Basaranoglu, Serdar
    Kanat-Pektas, Mine
    Api, Murat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2017, 137 (03) : 314 - 318
  • [5] Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and screening: now and the future
    Palini, Simone
    De Stefani, Silvia
    Primiterra, Mariangela
    Galluzzi, Luca
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 31 (10) : 755 - 759
  • [6] Clinical factors associated with pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent pregnancy loss
    Miyaji, Maho
    Deguchi, Masashi
    Tanimura, Kenji
    Sasagawa, Yuki
    Morizane, Mayumi
    Ebina, Yasuhiko
    Yamada, Hideto
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 (10) : 913 - 918
  • [7] RELATIVE RISK OF CLINICAL PREGNANCY LOSS BY AGE IN UNTESTED VS PRE-IMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTED (PGT-A) EMBRYOS
    Bergin, Keri
    Leibner, Lily
    Levin, Isabelle Kate
    Baird, Morgan
    Lee, Joseph
    Cacchione, Teresa
    Friedenthal, Jenna
    Nazem, Taraneh Gharib
    Copperman, Alan B.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 120 (04) : E239 - E240
  • [8] SHOULD PRE-IMPLANTATION GENETIC SCREENING (PGS) BE RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISK AND LOW RISK PATIENTS?
    Werlin, L. B.
    Emeny-Smith, K.
    Dunn, K.
    Nass, T.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (03) : E27 - E27
  • [9] Is the polar body approach best for pre-implantation genetic screening?
    Delhanty, Joy D. A.
    PLACENTA, 2011, 32 : S268 - S270
  • [10] The role of total chromosomal disomy in human spermatozoa as a predictor of the outcome of pre-implantation genetic screening
    Jiang, Suhua
    Peng, Xiangjie
    Gong, Fei
    Huang, Chuan
    Peng, Yangqin
    Long, Xingyu
    Lin, Ge
    Zhu, Wenbing
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 113 (06) : 1196 - +