Cost-benefit analysis of a national thalassaemia prevention programme in Israel

被引:32
|
作者
Ginsberg, G
Tulchinsky, T
Filon, D
Goldfarb, A
Abramov, L
Rachmilevitz, EA
机构
[1] Minist Hlth, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hadassah Hebrew Univ Hosp, Ein Kerem, Israel
[3] Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
thalassaemia; cost-benefit analysis;
D O I
10.1136/jms.5.3.120
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective-In Israel (population 5.7 million) there are around 200 known living subjects with thalassaemia major, of whom around 80% are from the northern district. This study aims at examining the costs and benefits of a national screening programme to prevent thalassaemia in Israel. Measurements and main results-The lifetime healthcare costs of caring for a person born with thalassaemia major are $284 154. The costs of the home infusion service (33.1%) actually exceed the costs of the chelating agent itself (22.1%). The remaining 44.8% of costs are due to stay in hospital, operations, outpatient visits. laboratory tests, therapists, etc. Lost earnings and premature mortality costs account for a further $51 843 and $141 944 respectively for each case. A national screening programme would cost $900 197 and prevent around 13.4 homozygotes being born, at a cost of $67 369 for each birth prevented. The benefit-cost ratio of the programme to the health services is 4.22:1, which increases to 6.01:1 when a societal perspective is taken. However, around 13.0 homozygote births are still expected to occur, the majority owing to lack of compliance of patients at various stages in the screening process. The addition of a national health education programme for the higher risk non-Jewish population either nationally or in selected regions will incur extra costs, which may be covered by increased benefits as a result of better compliance with the screening programme. Conclusion-Israel should start to provide a nationwide thalassaemia screening programme as the monetary benefits to society (and even to the health services alone) will exceed the screening programmes costs.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 126
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-benefit analysis of the Polish hepatitis B prevention programme
    Wiewióra-Pilecka, D
    [J]. VACCINE, 2000, 18 : S52 - S54
  • [2] A victim-centred cost-benefit analysis of a stalking prevention programme
    Tompson, Lisa
    Belur, Jyoti
    Jerath, Kritika
    [J]. CRIME SCIENCE, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [3] Cost-benefit analysis of constructing a filtration plant for the National Water Carrier in Israel
    Lavee, Doron
    [J]. WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 23 (04) : 300 - 309
  • [4] Prevention of beta Thalassemia in Northern Israel - a Cost-Benefit Analysisl
    Koren, Ariel
    Profeta, Lora
    Zalman, Luci
    Palmor, Haya
    Levin, Carina
    Zamir, Ronit Bril
    Shalev, Stavit
    Blondheim, Orna
    [J]. MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 6 (01):
  • [5] COST-BENEFIT OF PREVENTION
    Scheeline, Alexander
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2012, 90 (02) : 2 - 2
  • [6] Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Meningitis Prevention Programme in The Philippines
    M. Rhona M. T. Limcangco
    Carol L. Armour
    Eugene G. Salole
    Susan J. Taylor
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2001, 19 : 391 - 400
  • [7] Cost-benefit analysis of a Haemophilus influenzae type B meningitis prevention programme in the Philippines
    Limcangco, MRMT
    Armour, CL
    Salole, EG
    Taylor, SJ
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (04) : 391 - 400
  • [8] Cost-benefit analysis of a projected national human papilloma virus vaccination programme in Lebanon
    Bahr, Sarah
    Bzieh, Rania
    El Hayek, Ghinwa Y.
    Adib, Salim
    [J]. EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (10) : 715 - 721
  • [9] A cost-benefit analysis of an international dual degree programme
    Asgary, Nader
    Robbert, Mary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 32 (03) : 317 - 325
  • [10] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Crime Prevention Policies
    Nagin, Daniel S.
    [J]. CRIMINOLOGY & PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 14 (04) : 583 - 587