UAV-based multispectral remote sensing for precision agriculture: A comparison between different cameras

被引:277
|
作者
Deng, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Zhihui [1 ]
Li, Xiaojuan [1 ]
Hu, Zhuowei [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Fuzhou [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yanan [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Normal Univ, Coll Resource Environm & Tourism, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[2] MOE, Spatial Informat Technol Engn Res Ctr, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Multispectral camera; Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV); Remote sensing; Vegetation index; SPAD value; LEAF CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; EMPIRICAL LINE METHOD; RADIOMETRIC CALIBRATION; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY; VEGETATION INDEXES; NITROGEN STATUS; CROP; MAIZE; PHENOLOGY; AIRBORNE;
D O I
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.09.008
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based multispectral remote sensing has shown great potential for precision agriculture. However, there are many problems in data acquisition, processing and application, which have stunted its development. In this study, a narrowband Mini-MCA6 multispectral camera and a sunshine-sensor equipped broadband Sequoia multispectral camera were mounted on a multirotor micro-UAV. They were used to simultaneously collect multispectral imagery and soil plant analysis development (SPAD) values of maize at multiple sampling points in the field, in addition to the spectral reflectances of six standard diffuse reflectance panels with different reflectance values (4.5%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 60% and 65%). The accuracies of the reflectance and vegetation indices (Vls) derived from the imagery were compared, and the effectiveness and accuracy of the SPAD prediction from the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and red-edge NDVI (reNDVI) under different nitrogen treatments were examined at the plot level. The results show that the narrowband Mini-MCA6 camera could produce more accurate reflectance values than the broadband Sequoia camera, but only if the appropriate calibration method (the nonlinear subband empirical line method) was adopted, especially in visible (blue, green and red) bands. However, the accuracy of the VIs was not completely dependent on the accuracy of the reflectance, i.e., the NDVI from Mini-MCA6 was slightly better than that from Sequoia, whereas Sequoia produced more accurate reNDVI than did Mini-MCA6. At the plot level, reNDVI performed better than NDVI in SPAD prediction regardless of which camera was employed. Moreover, the reNDVI had relatively low sensitivity to the vegetation coverage and was insignificantly affected by environmental factors (e.g., exposed sandy soil). This study indicates that UAV multispectral remote sensing technology is instructive for precision agriculture, but more effort is needed regarding calibration methods for vegetation, postprocessing techniques and robust quantitative studies.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 136
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spectral Comparison of UAV-Based Hyper and Multispectral Cameras for Precision Viticulture
    Di Gennaro, Salvatore Filippo
    Toscano, Piero
    Gatti, Matteo
    Poni, Stefano
    Berton, Andrea
    Matese, Alessandro
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [2] From Satellite to UAV-Based Remote Sensing: A Review on Precision Agriculture
    Phang, Swee King
    Chiang, Tsai Hou Adam
    Happonen, Ari
    Chang, Miko May Lee
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 127057 - 127076
  • [3] The potential of UAV-based remote sensing for supporting precision agriculture in Indonesia
    Rokhmana, Catur Aries
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LAPAN-IPB SATELLITE (LISAT) FOR FOOD SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2015, 24 : 245 - 253
  • [4] Lessons Learned from UAV-Based Remote Sensing for Precision Agriculture
    Bhandari, Subodh
    Raheja, Amar
    Chaichi, Mohammad R.
    Green, Robert L.
    Do, Dat
    Pham, Frank H.
    Ansari, Mehdi
    Wolf, Joseph G.
    Sherman, Tristan M.
    Espinas, Antonio
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS), 2018, : 458 - 467
  • [5] A Subband Radiometric Calibration Method for UAV-Based Multispectral Remote Sensing
    Deng, Lei
    Hao, Xianglei
    Mao, Zhihui
    Yan, Yanan
    Sun, Jie
    Zhang, Aiwu
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 11 (08) : 2869 - 2880
  • [6] A Review on UAV-Based Applications for Precision Agriculture
    Tsouros, Dimosthenis C.
    Bibi, Stamatia
    Sarigiannidis, Panagiotis G.
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2019, 10 (11)
  • [7] UAV-BASED REMOTE SENSING OF LANDSLIDES
    Niethammer, U.
    Rothmund, S.
    James, M. R.
    Travelletti, J.
    Joswig, M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ISPRS COMMISSION V MID-TERM SYMPOSIUM CLOSE RANGE IMAGE MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2010, 38 : 496 - 501
  • [8] UAV-based Smart Agriculture: a Review of UAV Sensing and Applications
    Moradi, Salaheddin
    Bokani, Ayub
    Hassan, Jahan
    [J]. 2022 32ND INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (ITNAC), 2022, : 181 - 184
  • [9] Analysis of UAV-based Multispectral Reflectance Variability for Agriculture Monitoring
    Ahn, Ho-yong
    Na, Sang-il
    Park, Chan-won
    Hong, Suk-young
    So, Kyu-ho
    Lee, Kyung-do
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 36 (06) : 1379 - 1391
  • [10] REMOTE SENSING TO UAV-BASED DIGITAL FARMLAND
    Falco, Nicola
    Wainwright, Haruko
    Ulrich, Craig
    Dafflon, Baptiste
    Hubbard, Susan S.
    Williamson, Malcolm
    Cothren, Jackson D.
    Ham, Richard G.
    McEntire, Jay A.
    McEntire, McClain
    [J]. IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 5936 - 5939