Modeling Agricultural Watersheds with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT): Calibration and Validation with a Novel Procedure for Spatially Explicit HRUs

被引:80
|
作者
Teshager, Awoke Dagnew [1 ]
Gassman, Philip W. [2 ]
Secchi, Silvia [3 ]
Schoof, Justin T. [4 ]
Misgna, Girmaye [1 ]
机构
[1] So Illinois Univ, Environm Resources & Policy, 1400 Douglas Dr, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Econ, Ctr Agr & Rural Dev, 560A Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] So Illinois Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Resources, Faner Hall, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
[4] So Illinois Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Resources, 4537 Faner Hall, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Watershed modeling; SWAT; Calibration; Flow; Landuse; HRUs; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE; RACCOON RIVER; QUALITY; SENSITIVITY; MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORT; BASEFLOW; AREAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-015-0636-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Applications of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model typically involve delineation of a watershed into subwatersheds/subbasins that are then further subdivided into hydrologic response units (HRUs) which are homogeneous areas of aggregated soil, landuse, and slope and are the smallest modeling units used within the model. In a given standard SWAT application, multiple potential HRUs (farm fields) in a subbasin are usually aggregated into a single HRU feature. In other words, the standard version of the model combines multiple potential HRUs (farm fields) with the same landuse/landcover, soil, and slope, but located at different places of a subbasin (spatially non-unique), and considers them as one HRU. In this study, ArcGIS pre-processing procedures were developed to spatially define a one-to-one match between farm fields and HRUs (spatially unique HRUs) within a subbasin prior to SWAT simulations to facilitate input processing, input/output mapping, and further analysis at the individual farm field level. Model input data such as landuse/landcover (LULC), soil, crop rotation, and other management data were processed through these HRUs. The SWAT model was then calibrated/validated for Raccoon River watershed in Iowa for 2002-2010 and Big Creek River watershed in Illinois for 2000-2003. SWAT was able to replicate annual, monthly, and daily streamflow, as well as sediment, nitrate and mineral phosphorous within recommended accuracy in most cases. The one-to-one match between farm fields and HRUs created and used in this study is a first step in performing LULC change, climate change impact, and other analyses in a more spatially explicit manner.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 911
页数:18
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Modeling Agricultural Watersheds with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT): Calibration and Validation with a Novel Procedure for Spatially Explicit HRUs
    Awoke Dagnew Teshager
    Philip W Gassman
    Silvia Secchi
    Justin T Schoof
    Girmaye Misgna
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2016, 57 : 894 - 911
  • [2] Defining Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrologic response units (HRUs) by field boundaries
    Kalcic, Margaret M.
    Chaubey, Indrajeet
    Frankenberger, Jane
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 8 (03) : 69 - 80
  • [3] A Review of the Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in Karst Watersheds
    Al Khoury, Ibrahim
    Boithias, Laurie
    Labat, David
    [J]. WATER, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [4] Calibration and validation of soil and water assessment tool on an agricultural watershed in upstate New York
    Benaman, J
    Shoemaker, CA
    Haith, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2005, 10 (05) : 363 - 374
  • [5] Integration of the soil and water assessment tool with the Information System in watersheds modeling
    Khairy, WA
    Hannoura, AP
    Coleman, TL
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR AGRICULTURE, ECOSYSTEMS, AND HYDROLOGY III, 2002, 4542 : 61 - 71
  • [6] Comparison of Calibration Approaches of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model in a Tropical Watershed
    Makumbura, Randika K.
    Gunathilake, Miyuru B.
    Samarasinghe, Jayanga T.
    Confesor, Remegio
    Muttil, Nitin
    Rathnayake, Upaka
    [J]. HYDROLOGY, 2022, 9 (10)
  • [7] Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool for six watersheds of Lake Erie: Model parameterization and calibration
    Bosch, Nathan S.
    Allan, J. David
    Dolan, David M.
    Han, Haejin
    Richards, R. Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2011, 37 (02) : 263 - 271
  • [8] Hydrologic calibration and validation of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool for the Leon River watershed
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2008, 63 (06) : 533 - 541
  • [9] Calibration and validation of soil water assessment tool for Poondi Micro-Watershed
    Eshanthini, P.
    Nandhakumar, S.
    Praveenkumar, T. R.
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2022, 249 : 165 - 173
  • [10] Field-scale calibration of crop-yield parameters in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)
    Sinnathamby, Sumathy
    Douglas-Mankin, Kyle R.
    Craige, Collin
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2017, 180 : 61 - 69