Comparison of depth-dose distributions of proton therapeutic beams calculated by means of logical detectors and ionization chamber modeled in Monte Carlo codes

被引:4
|
作者
Pietrzak, Robert [1 ]
Konefal, Adam [1 ]
Sokol, Maria [2 ]
Orlef, Andrzej [2 ]
机构
[1] Silesian Univ, Inst Phys, Dept Nucl Phys & Its Applicat, Uniwersytecka 4, PL-40007 Katowice, Poland
[2] Maria Sklodowska Curie Mem Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Inst Oncol, Gliwice, Poland
关键词
Logical detector; Markus chamber; Proton therapy; MCNPX; HADRON THERAPY; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; GEANT4; MCNPX; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.nima.2016.04.090
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
The success of proton therapy depends strongly on the precision of treatment planning. Dose distribution in biological tissue may be obtained from Monte Carlo simulations using various scientific codes making it possible to perform very accurate calculations. However, there are many factors affecting the accuracy of modeling. One of them is a structure of objects called bins registering a dose. In this work the influence of bin structure on the dose distributions was examined. The MCNPX code calculations of Bragg curve for the 60 MeV proton beam were done in two ways: using simple logical detectors being the volumes determined in water, and using a precise model of ionization chamber used in clinical dosimetry. The results of the simulations were verified experimentally in the water phantom with Marcus ionization chamber. The average local dose difference between the measured relative doses in the water phantom and those calculated by means of the logical detectors was 1.4% at first 25 mm, whereas in the full depth range this difference was 1.6% for the maximum uncertainty in the calculations less than 2.4% and for the maximum measuring error of 1%. In case of the relative doses calculated with the use of the ionization chamber model this average difference was somewhat greater, being 2.3% at depths up to 25 mm and 2.4% in the full range of depths for the maximum uncertainty in the calculations of 3%. In the dose calculations the ionization chamber model does not offer any additional advantages over the logical detectors. The results provided by both models are similar and in good agreement with the measurements, however, the logical detector approach is a more time-effective method. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 59
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] An analytical approximation of depth-dose distributions for therapeutic proton beams
    Bortfeld, T
    Schlegel, W
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (08): : 1331 - 1339
  • [2] MONTE-CARLO METHOD FOR DEPTH-DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS FROM DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY BEAMS
    GIBBS, SJ
    KING, RJ
    PUJOL, A
    [J]. RADIATION RESEARCH, 1976, 67 (03) : 615 - 615
  • [3] Comparison of measured and Monte Carlo-calculated electron depth dose distributions in aluminium
    Vandana, S.
    Benny, P. G.
    Selvam, T. Palani
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PURE & APPLIED PHYSICS, 2018, 56 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [4] Comparison of MCNP4C and EGSnrc Monte Carlo codes in depth-dose calculation of low energy clinical electron beams
    Jabbari, N.
    Hashemi-Malayeri, B.
    Farajollahi, A. R.
    Kazemnejad, A.
    Shafaei, A.
    Jabbari, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2007, 40 (15) : 4519 - 4524
  • [5] Verification of the use of GEANT4 and MCNPX Monte Carlo codes for calculations of the depth-dose distributions in water for the proton therapy of eye tumours
    Grzadziel, Maigorzata
    Konefal, Adam
    Zipper, Wiktor
    Pietrzak, Robert
    Bzymek, Ewelina
    [J]. NUKLEONIKA, 2014, 59 (02) : 61 - 66
  • [6] Comparison of measured and Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions in inhomogeneous phantoms in clinical electron beams
    Doucet, R
    Olivares, M
    DeBlois, F
    Podgorsak, EB
    Kawrakow, I
    Seuntjens, J
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (15): : 2339 - 2354
  • [7] Comparison of measured and Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions from circular collimators for radiosurgical beams
    Esnaashari, K. N.
    Allahverdi, M.
    Gharaati, H.
    Shahriari, M.
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2007, 5 (01): : 31 - 36
  • [8] Comparison of two hadron transport Monte Carlo codes (PTRAN, MCNPX) for calculation of dose and spectral distributions in clinical proton beams
    Verhaegen, F
    Palmans, H
    Kacperek, A
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1247 - 1247
  • [9] Monte Carlo calculated ionization chamber correction factors in clinical proton beams - deriving uncertainties from published data
    Baumann, Kilian-Simon
    Goma, Carles
    Wulff, Joerg
    Kretschmer, Jana
    Zink, Klemens
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 113
  • [10] Application of diamond detectors to the dosimetry of 45 and 100 kVp therapy beams: comparison with a parallel-plate ionization chamber and Monte Carlo
    Hugtenburg, RP
    Johnston, K
    Chalmers, GJ
    Beddoe, AH
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (09): : 2489 - 2501