Comparison of CMIP3 and CMIP5 projected hydrologic conditions over the Upper Colorado River Basin

被引:23
|
作者
Ayers, Jessica [1 ]
Ficklin, Darren L. [2 ,3 ]
Stewart, Iris T. [4 ]
Strunk, Meredith [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, Bloomington, IN USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Geog, 701 E,KirkwoodAve, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Indiana Geol Survey, Ctr Geospatial Data Anal, Bloomington, IN USA
[4] Santa Clara Univ, Dept Environm Studies & Sci, Santa Clara, CA 95053 USA
关键词
CMIP3; CMIP5; SWAT; Colorado River; snowmelt; climate change; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; NORTH-AMERICAN CLIMATE; WATER-RESOURCES; HISTORICAL SIMULATIONS; PRECIPITATION; STREAMFLOW; MODEL; VARIABILITY; DROUGHT; SCENARIO;
D O I
10.1002/joc.4594
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This work presents updated hydrologic projections for the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB) using downscaled (approximately 12 km) General Circulation Model (GCM) output from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project - Phase 5 (CMIP5) with a comparison to CMIP3 GCMs. We use the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model to simulate the impacts of end-of-century climate change on the UCRB using 21 CMIP5 and 18 CMIP3 GCMs, collected into one CMIP5 ensemble and one CMIP3 ensemble, respectively. Previous CMIP3 studies have identified a drier climate for the UCRB because of projected increases in temperature and decreases/little change in precipitation. Hydrologic simulations from CMIP5 inputs suggest wetter conditions than simulations based on CMIP3 inputs, yet drier conditions than the historical climate. Both ensembles lead to timing shifts in peak streamflow during the snowmelt season from changes in snowmelt, but the higher CMIP5 projected precipitation leads to, on average, peak streamflows 200-300 m(3) s(-1) larger (25-40% difference) than the CMIP3 projections. This difference is largely generated in the northern UCRB region, where CMIP5 simulations project much more significant increases in streamflow than CMIP3. This increase is largely due to an overall larger rise in precipitation in the CMIP5 ensemble (57% of the total UCRB area) compared to the CMIP3 ensemble (5%). Even with projected increases in precipitation, snowmelt is projected to decrease dramatically throughout the UCRB for both ensembles. The increases in precipitation and decreases in snowmelt leads to significant differences in hydrologic flux components between the CMIP3 and CMIP5 ensembles, such as end-of-century rises in soil water content and evapotranspiration in the CMIP5 ensemble compared to the CMIP3 ensemble. The difference between the dry CMIP3 and the somewhat wetter CMIP5 projections may be critical for water management in the already over-allocated UCRB.
引用
收藏
页码:3807 / 3818
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Projected Future Changes in the Asian Monsoon: A Comparison of CMIP3 and CMIP5 Model Results
    Ogata, Tomomichi
    Ueda, Hiroaki
    Inoue, Tomoshige
    Hayasaki, Masamitsu
    Yoshida, Ai
    Watanabe, Shigeru
    Kira, Mayuko
    Ooshiro, Megumi
    Kumai, Atsuki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2014, 92 (03) : 207 - 225
  • [2] Surface Air Temperature Simulations over China with CMIP5 and CMIP3
    Guo Yan
    Dong Wen-Jie
    Ren Fu-Min
    Zhao Zong-Ci
    Huang Jian-Bin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2013, 4 (03) : 145 - 152
  • [3] Surface Air Temperature Simulations over China with CMIP5 and CMIP3
    GUO Yan
    DONG Wen-Jie
    REN Fu-Min
    ZHAO Zong-Ci
    HUANG Jian-Bin
    [J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2013, 4 (03) : 145 - 152
  • [4] Comparison of Monthly Temperature Extremes Simulated by CMIP3 and CMIP5 Models
    Yao, Yao
    Luo, Yong
    Huang, Jianbin
    Zhao, Zongci
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (19) : 7692 - 7707
  • [5] Use of CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate models to simulate change discharge in the Chao Phraya River Basin
    Aribarg, Thannob
    Kimpan, Chom
    Supratid, Seree
    [J]. 2017 21ST INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (ICSEC 2017), 2017, : 272 - 275
  • [6] Robustness of Precipitation Projections in China:Comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP3 Models
    CHEN Huo-Po
    SUN Jian-Qi
    [J]. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 2014, 7 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [7] Robustness of Precipitation Projections in China: Comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP3 Models
    Chen Huo-Po
    Sun Jian-Qi
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2014, 7 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [8] The spectral dimension of longwave feedback in the CMIP3 and CMIP5 experiments
    Huang, Xianglei
    Chen, Xiuhong
    Soden, Brian J.
    Liu, Xu
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 41 (22) : 7830 - 7837
  • [9] Simulated Precipitation and Reservoir Inflow in the Chao Phraya River Basin by Multi-model Ensemble CMIP3 and CMIP5
    Aribarg, Thannob
    Supratid, Seree
    [J]. DATA MINING AND BIG DATA, DMBD 2017, 2017, 10387 : 455 - 463
  • [10] Evolutions of Asian Summer Monsoon in the CMIP3 and CMIP5 Models
    Tung, Yu-Shiang
    Chen, Cheng-Ta
    Hsu, Pang-Chi
    [J]. SOLA, 2014, 10 : 88 - 92