A Comparative Study on Different Online State of Charge Estimation Algorithms for Lithium-Ion Batteries

被引:8
|
作者
Khan, Zeeshan Ahmad [1 ]
Shrivastava, Prashant [2 ]
Amrr, Syed Muhammad [3 ]
Mekhilef, Saad [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Algethami, Abdullah A. [7 ]
Seyedmahmoudian, Mehdi [5 ]
Stojcevski, Alex [5 ]
机构
[1] Volkswagen AG, CARAID SE, D-85053 Ingolstadt, Germany
[2] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Ctr Automot Res & Tribol CART, New Delhi 110016, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Elect Engn, New Delhi 110016, India
[4] Univ Malaya, Dept Elect Engn, Power Elect & Renewable Energy Res Lab PEARL, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[5] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sch Software & Elect Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3122, Australia
[6] King Abdulaziz Univ, Ctr Res Excellence Renewable Energy & Power Syst, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[7] Taif Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
关键词
lithium-ion battery; state of charge; electric vehicle; battery model; estimation; EXTENDED KALMAN FILTER; EQUIVALENT-CIRCUIT MODELS; OF-CHARGE; NEURAL-NETWORK; SOC ESTIMATION; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; ENERGY ESTIMATION; POWER BATTERY; VALIDATION; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.3390/su14127412
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With an accurate state of charge (SOC) estimation, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) can be protected from overcharge, deep discharge, and thermal runaway. However, selecting appropriate algorithms to maintain the trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency is challenging, especially under dynamic load profiles such as electric vehicles. In this study, seven different widely utilized online SOC estimation algorithms were considered with the following goals: (a) to compare the accuracy of the different algorithms; (b) to compare the computational time in the simulation. Since the 2-RC battery model is highly accurate and not very computationally complex, it was selected for implementing the considered algorithms for the model-based SOC estimation. The considered online SOC estimation performance was evaluated using measurement data obtained from experimental tests on commercial lithium manganese cobalt oxide batteries. The experimental analysis consisted of a dynamic current profile comprising a worldwide harmonized light vehicle test procedure (WLTP) cycle and constant current discharging pulses. In addition, the performance of the considered different algorithms was compared in terms of estimation error and computational time to understand the challenges of each algorithm. The results indicated that the extended Kalman filter (EKF) and sliding mode observer (SMO) were the best choices because of their estimation accuracy and computation time. However, achieving the SOC estimation accuracy depended on the battery modeling. On the other hand, the estimated SOC root means square error (RMSE) using a backpropagation neural network (BPNN) was less than that using a Luenberger observer (LO). Moreover, with the advantages of BPNNs, such as no need for battery modeling, the estimation error could be further reduced using a large size dataset.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative study of different deep learning algorithms for lithium-ion batteries on state-of-charge estimation
    Guo, Shanshan
    Ma, Liang
    [J]. ENERGY, 2023, 263
  • [2] A Comparative study on state of charge estimation techniques for Lithium-ion Batteries
    Aryal, Amit
    Hossain, M. J.
    Khalilpour, Kaveh
    [J]. 2021 IEEE PES INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES - ASIA (ISGT ASIA), 2021,
  • [3] An Online Estimation Algorithm of State-of-Charge of Lithium-ion Batteries
    Feng, Yong
    Meng, Cheng
    Han, Fengling
    Yi, Xun
    Yu, Xinghuo
    [J]. IECON 2018 - 44TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, 2018, : 3879 - 3882
  • [4] A Comparative Study of State-of-Charge Estimation Algorithms for Lithium-ion Batteries in Wireless Charging Electric Vehicles
    Tian, Yong
    Li, Dong
    Tian, Jindong
    Xia, Bizhong
    [J]. IEEE PELS WORKSHOP ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES: WIRELESS POWER (2016 WOW), 2016, : 186 - 190
  • [5] Comparative Study of the Influence of Open Circuit Voltage Tests on State of Charge Online Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries
    Li, Yuan
    Guo, Hao
    Qi, Fei
    Guo, Zhiping
    Li, Meiying
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 17535 - 17547
  • [6] Online state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries: A moving horizon estimation approach
    Shen, Jia-Ni
    He, Yi-Jun
    Ma, Zi-Feng
    Luo, Hong-Bin
    Zhang, Zi-Feng
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2016, 154 : 42 - 53
  • [7] Online State of Charge and Electrical Impedance Estimation for Multicell Lithium-ion Batteries
    Kim, Taesic
    Qiao, Wei
    Qu, Liyan
    [J]. 2013 IEEE TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE AND EXPO (ITEC), 2013,
  • [8] Influence of different open circuit voltage tests on state of charge online estimation for lithium-ion batteries
    Zheng, Fangdan
    Xing, Yinjiao
    Jiang, Jiuchun
    Sun, Bingxiang
    Kim, Jonghoon
    Pecht, Michael
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 183 : 513 - 525
  • [9] Fast Estimation of State of Charge for Lithium-Ion Batteries
    Wu, Shing-Lih
    Chen, Hung-Cheng
    Chou, Shuo-Rong
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (05) : 3438 - 3452
  • [10] Adaptive Estimation of State of Charge for Lithium-ion Batteries
    Fang, Huazhen
    Wang, Yebin
    Sahinoglu, Zafer
    Wada, Toshihiro
    Hara, Satoshi
    [J]. 2013 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2013, : 3485 - 3491