Evaluating the California gnatcatcher as an umbrella species for conservation of southern California coastal sage scrub

被引:84
|
作者
Rubinoff, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Div Insect Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00176.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Designing reserves that preserve the habitat of many coexisting and threatened species often involves use of conservation surrogates, such as umbrella species. Typically, animals with legal protection are used as umbrella species, and these selections are overwhelmingly vertebrates. The tacit assumption that vertebrates automatically serve as conservation umbrellas for invertebrates rarely has been justified. The California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica, Muscicapidae), is a federally listed and endangered species in the United States and has been used as an umbrella species for the conservation of coastal sage scrub in southern California. Conservation planning efforts for this community follow a general paradigm of using vertebrate-based reserve designs as de facto protection for invertebrate cohabitants. To test the effectiveness of this strategy, I surveyed 50 patches of coastal sage scrub in San Diego County for three species of Lepidoptera: Mormon metalmark (Apodemia mormo, Riodinidae), Bernardino blue, (Euphilotes bernardino, Lycaenidae), and Electra buckmoth (Hemileuca electra, Saturniidae). The presence of the gnatcatcher was a poor indicator of the presence of these insects. Only the largest or most recently separated habitat patches supported all three species of Lepidoptera, but the gnatcatcher was present on nearly every site, regardless of sim. Results indicate that vertebrates do not automatically function as umbrella species for invertebrate cohabitants. Reserve designs based on vertebrate umbrella species, which assume invertebrates will be protected, may result in the loss of a large portion of invertebrate diversity.
引用
收藏
页码:1374 / 1383
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Subspecies differentiation and range-wide genetic structure are driven by climate in the California gnatcatcher, a flagship species for coastal sage scrub conservation
    Vandergast, Amy G.
    Kus, Barbara E.
    Wood, Dustin A.
    Milano, Elizabeth R.
    Preston, Kristine L.
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2022, 15 (07): : 1201 - 1217
  • [2] DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF COASTAL SAGE SCRUB IN SOUTHWESTERN CALIFORNIA
    DAVIS, FW
    STINE, PA
    STOMS, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1994, 5 (05) : 743 - 756
  • [3] BIRD SPECIES RESPONSES TO DROUGHT IN TWO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL SAGE SCRUB COMMUNITIES
    Myers, Brian M.
    Moriarty, David J.
    Questad, Erin J.
    [J]. SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST, 2022, 67 (02) : 105 - 115
  • [4] BIOMASS, PRODUCTION, AND LITTERFALL IN THE COASTAL SAGE SCRUB OF SOUTHERN-CALIFORNIA
    GRAY, JT
    SCHLESINGER, WH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1981, 68 (01) : 24 - 33
  • [5] POSTFIRE RECOVERY OF CALIFORNIA COASTAL SAGE SCRUB
    KEELEY, JE
    KEELEY, SC
    [J]. AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 1984, 111 (01): : 105 - 117
  • [6] Simple Approaches to Improve Restoration of Coastal Sage Scrub Habitat in Southern California
    Bell, Carl E.
    Allen, Edith B.
    Weathers, Kristin A.
    McGiffen, Milton, Jr.
    [J]. NATURAL AREAS JOURNAL, 2016, 36 (01) : 20 - 28
  • [7] FIRE MANAGEMENT IN COASTAL SAGE-SCRUB, SOUTHERN-CALIFORNIA, USA
    MALANSON, GP
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1985, 12 (02) : 141 - 146
  • [8] The Effects of Irrigation on Revegetation of Semi-Arid Coastal Sage Scrub in Southern California
    Pamela E. Padgett
    Sheila N. Kee
    Edith B. Allen
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2000, 26 : 427 - 435
  • [9] HISTORICAL RECORDS OF THE BUTTERFLY FAUNA AT A COASTAL SAGE SCRUB SITE IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, USA
    Pfeiler, Edward
    Jump, Peter M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS SOCIETY, 2010, 64 (04) : 211 - 215
  • [10] COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND PRODUCTIVITY IN CEANOTHUS CHAPARRAL AND COASTAL SAGE SCRUB OF SOUTHERN-CALIFORNIA
    GRAY, JT
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1982, 52 (04) : 415 - 435