Evaluating analytical methods for the characterization of lipids, proteins and carbohydrates in organic substrates for anaerobic co-digestion

被引:42
|
作者
Ohemeng-Ntiamoah, J. [1 ]
Datta, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tennessee Technol Univ, Ctr Management Utilizat & Protect Water Resources, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Box 5033, Cookeville, TN 38505 USA
关键词
Anaerobic co-digestion; Biomethane potential; Wastewater sludge; Foodwaste; Fats; oil and grease (FOG); WASTE ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; FOOD WASTE; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; THICKENED WASTE; DAIRY MANURE; STATE; OIL; FAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.154
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This study provides insights into the characterization of lipids, proteins and carbohydrate content in substrates for codigestion, and evaluates their effects on biogas yield. Among the analytical methods evaluated, the Bligh and Dyer, Hach Total Nitrogen and the Anthrone method were found to be most suitable for lipids, proteins and carbohydrates analysis, respectively. The co-digestibility of ten co-substrate mixes prepared using various volume- to-volume ratios of foodwaste (FW), fats, oils and grease (FOG), and waste activated sludge (WAS) were tested using biomethane potential assays. The three main substrates were mono-digested as well. WAS mono-digestion yielded the lowest methane yield of 118 mL CH4/g VS, while a 50: 50 mix of WAS and FOG, containing 85% lipid and 15% protein produced the highest methane yield of 1040 mL CH4/g VS. In general, lipid-rich samples yielded more biogas than samples rich in proteins and carbohydrates. However, samples rich in proteins and carbohydrates had faster biogas production rates.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 704
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Batch anaerobic co-digestion of proteins and carbohydrates
    Elbeshbishy, Elsayed
    Nakhla, George
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 116 : 170 - 178
  • [2] Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes
    Esposito, G.
    Frunzo, L.
    Giordano, A.
    Liotta, F.
    Panico, A.
    Pirozzi, F.
    [J]. REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 11 (04) : 325 - 341
  • [3] Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes
    G. Esposito
    L. Frunzo
    A. Giordano
    F. Liotta
    A. Panico
    F. Pirozzi
    [J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2012, 11 : 325 - 341
  • [4] Probiotic effects of anaerobic co-digestion substrates
    Brown, Nicola
    Guttler, Johanna
    Shilton, Andy
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 40 (18) : 2455 - 2459
  • [5] Anaerobic co-digestion of coffee waste with other organic substrates: A mixture experimental design
    Kampioti, Anastasia
    Komilis, Dimitrios
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 297
  • [6] Anaerobic co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste with several pure organic co-substrates
    Ponsa, Sergio
    Gea, Teresa
    Sanchez, Antoni
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2011, 108 (04) : 352 - 360
  • [7] Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion process of rural organic household waste with other substrates
    Liu, Yang
    Ye, Xiaomei
    Wang, Chengcheng
    Jia, Zhaoyan
    Du, Jing
    Kong, Xiangping
    Xi, Yonglan
    [J]. Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41 (05): : 2770 - 2777
  • [8] Generalised modelling approach for anaerobic co-digestion of fermentable substrates
    Garcia-Gen, Santiago
    Lema, Juan M.
    Rodriguez, Jorge
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 147 : 525 - 533
  • [9] Experimental study on optimization of multiple substrates anaerobic co-digestion
    Wang, Xuemei
    Li, Zifu
    Gao, Ruiling
    Yin, Fubin
    Wang, Dongling
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION ENGINEERING FOR MECHANICS AND MATERIALS, 2015, 21 : 837 - 843
  • [10] Evaluation of the biomethane yield from anaerobic co-digestion of nitrogenous substrates
    Allen, Eoin
    Browne, James D.
    Murphy, Jerry D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 34 (13-14) : 2059 - 2068