Surgery Insight: surgical management of postprostatectomy incontinence - the artificial urinary sphincter and male sling

被引:33
|
作者
Comiter, Craig V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY | 2007年 / 4卷 / 11期
关键词
artificial urinary sphincter; intrinsic sphincter deficiency; prostate cancer; sling; stress incontinence;
D O I
10.1038/ncpuro0935
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Stress urinary incontinence in men is usually a result of intrinsic sphincter deficiency following prostate cancer surgery. Active conservative management with fluid restriction, medication management and pelvic floor exercises is indicated for the first 12 months. If bothersome incontinence persists, urodynamic evaluation is indicated in order to assess detrusor storage function, contractility and sphincteric integrity. Standard surgical options include urethral bulking agents, artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male sling. Periurethral injection of bulking agents is satisfactory in only a minority of patients, leaving AUS and male sling as the most common surgical treatments. In patients with severe urinary incontinence, AUS seems to have a higher rate of success than the male sling. Furthermore, AUS is indicated in men with detrusor hypocontractility as adequate detrusor contractility is needed to overcome the fixed resistance of the sling. In patients with milder levels of stress incontinence, the two techniques have approximately equal efficacy in the short-to-intermediate term. While current reports of the male sling are generally limited to 1-4 years' follow-up, the infection, erosion, and revision rate for the male sling seem somewhat lower than that for the AUS in appropriately chosen patients.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 624
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条