The social cost of carbon and inequality: When local redistribution shapes global carbon prices

被引:19
|
作者
Kornek, Ulrike [1 ,2 ]
Klenert, David [3 ]
Edenhofer, Ottmar [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Fleurbaey, Marc [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Mercator Res Inst Global Commons & Climate Change, EUREF Campus 19, D-10829 Berlin, Germany
[2] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Chair Environm & Resource Econ, Wilhelm Sehlig Pl 1, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[3] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, C Inca Garcilaso 3, Seville 41092, Spain
[4] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, POB 60 12 03, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Econ Climate Change, Str 17 Juni 145, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[6] CNRS, 48 Bd Jourdan, F-75014 Paris, France
[7] Paris Sch Econ, 48 Bd Jourdan, F-75014 Paris, France
关键词
Optimal taxation; Inequality; Climate change; Social cost of carbon; Carbon tax; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DAMAGE COSTS; EMISSIONS; POVERTY; POLICY; GROWTH; TAXES; TEMPERATURE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102450
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The social cost of carbon is a central metric for optimal carbon prices. Previous literature shows that inequality significantly influences the social cost of carbon, but mostly omits het-erogeneity below the national level. We present an optimal taxation model of the social cost of carbon that accounts for inequality between and within countries. We find that climate and distributional policy can generally not be separated. If only one country does not compen-sate low-income households for disproportionate damages, the social cost of carbon tends to increase globally. Optimal carbon prices remain roughly unchanged if national redistribu-tion leaves inequality between households unaffected by climate change and if the utility of households is approximately logarithmic in consumption. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inequality and the Social Cost of Carbon
    Anthoff, David
    Emmerling, Johannes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2019, 6 (02) : 29 - 59
  • [2] Climate Risks and Carbon Prices: Revising the Social Cost of Carbon
    Ackerman, Frank
    Stanton, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL, 2012, 6
  • [3] Social cost of carbon: Global duty
    Guivarch, Celine
    Mejean, Aurelie
    Pottier, Antonin
    Fleurbaey, Marc
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2016, 351 (6278) : 1160 - 1161
  • [4] The Social Cost of Carbon: A Global Imperative
    Revesz, Richard L.
    Schwartz, Jason A.
    Howard, Peter H.
    Arrow, Kenneth
    Livermore, Michael A.
    Oppenheimer, Michael
    Sterner, Thomas
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2017, 11 (01) : 172 - 173
  • [5] Global carbon inequality
    Hubacek K.
    Baiocchi G.
    Feng K.
    Muñoz Castillo R.
    Sun L.
    Xue J.
    [J]. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2017, 2 (6) : 361 - 369
  • [6] MAN GLOBAL REDISTRIBUTION OF CARBON
    BJORKSTROM, A
    [J]. AMBIO, 1979, 8 (06) : 254 - 259
  • [7] A near-term to net zero alternative to the social cost of carbon for setting carbon prices
    Noah Kaufman
    Alexander R. Barron
    Wojciech Krawczyk
    Peter Marsters
    Haewon McJeon
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2020, 10 : 1010 - 1014
  • [8] A near-term to net zero alternative to the social cost of carbon for setting carbon prices
    Kaufman, Noah
    Barron, Alexander R.
    Krawczyk, Wojciech
    Marsters, Peter
    McJeon, Haewon
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 10 (11) : 1010 - +
  • [9] Estimating a social cost of carbon for global energy consumption
    Ashwin Rode
    Tamma Carleton
    Michael Delgado
    Michael Greenstone
    Trevor Houser
    Solomon Hsiang
    Andrew Hultgren
    Amir Jina
    Robert E. Kopp
    Kelly E. McCusker
    Ishan Nath
    James Rising
    Jiacan Yuan
    [J]. Nature, 2021, 598 : 308 - 314
  • [10] Two Moral Arguments for a Global Social Cost of Carbon
    Mintz-Woo, Kian
    [J]. ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 21 (01) : 60 - 63