Cognitive benefits of right-handedness: A meta-analysis

被引:63
|
作者
Somers, Metten [1 ]
Shields, Laura S. [2 ]
Boks, Marco P. [1 ]
Kahn, Rene S. [1 ]
Sommer, Iris E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Brain Ctr Rudolf Magnus, Dept Psychiat, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Earth & Life Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Hand preference; Verbal ability; Spatial ability; Lateralization; Meta-analysis; HAND PREFERENCE; CEREBRAL LATERALIZATION; FAMILIAL SINISTRALITY; SEX-DIFFERENCES; LANGUAGE LATERALIZATION; BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS; HEMISPHERE LANGUAGE; SPATIAL ABILITIES; MENTAL ROTATION; VERBAL-ABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Hand preference - which is related to cerebral dominance - is thought to be associated with cognitive skills; however, findings on this association are inconsistent and there is no consensus whether left- or right-handers have an advantage in either spatial or verbal abilities. In addition, it is not clear whether an interaction between sex and hand preference exists in relation to these cognitive abilities. As these matters are relevant from a neurodevelopmental perspective we performed a meta-analysis of the available literature. We searched PubMed and Embase, and included 14 studies (359,890 subjects) in the verbal ability meta-analysis and 16 studies (218,351 subjects) in the spatial ability meta-analysis. There was no difference between the full sample of left and right-handers for verbal ability, nor was there a hand preference-by-sex interaction. Subgroup analysis of children showed a small right-hand benefit. Our results further revealed a modest but significant effect favouring right-handedness for overall spatial ability, which was more pronounced when analysis was restricted to studies applying the mental rotation test. We could not identify a specific interaction with sex. Our results indicate that there is a small but significant cognitive advantage of right-handedness on spatial ability. In the verbal domain, this advantage is only significant in children. An interaction effect with sex is not confirmed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 63
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条