FINANCIAL INVESTMENT COMPANIES (SIFS) RELATIVE VALUATION AND FUNDAMENTALS

被引:0
|
作者
Dragoi, Bogdan Alexandru [1 ]
Stancu, Ion [2 ]
Mitroi, Adrian [2 ]
Stancu, Andrei Tudor [3 ]
机构
[1] SIF Banat Crisana, Arad, Romania
[2] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Bucharest, Romania
[3] Univ E Anglia, Norwich Business Sch, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
Stock return; Corporate Finance; Corporate Investment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We researched the impact of economic data analysis and fundamental financial valuation multiples on the Financial Investments Companies FICs (SIFs) valuations and market prices to assess how relevant these multiples are for relative calculations and ranking of these investment companies. In the first attempt to answer the primary question of our research, we applied the comparison evaluation via multiple methods in order to assess the relative value of the all 5 FICs (SIFs) listed on the Romanian Bucharest Stock Exchange, based on fundamental parameters of the analysis. One answer to the question of our research is that ROE and ROA multiples are the independent variables that best explains the relative valuation differences between the 5 FICs (SIFs). Then, we further approach the second part of the research question trying to identify any possible statistical relationships between multiples relative evaluation and the fundamental factors that feasibly influence these multiples. We analyzed nine regression equations between the three multiples (EV/EBITDA; P/E and Price/Book) and three of their possible independent fundamental factors (MktCap; Tax Rate; ROA; ROE and Reinvestment Rate). We performed our analysis for all 5 FICs (SIFs). Correlation between multiple fundamental factors suggests that the most significant are their relations with rates of return (ROA and ROE), and with the rate of reinvestment of net profit (ReinvRate). The negative correlation between the EV/EBITDA multiple and P/E multiple, on the one hand, and the ROE and ReinvRate, on the other hand, is explained by the fact that the profits number of the two multiples are included as denominator of the ratios of these multiples.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 40
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] VALUATION BY INVESTMENT COMPANIES OF RESTRICTED SECURITIES - CONSEQUENCES OF IMPROPER VALUATIONS IN FINANCIAL REPORTS
    GARDNER, WE
    [J]. BUSINESS LAWYER, 1970, 25 (04): : 1547 - 1560
  • [2] VALUATION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS IN THE INSURANCE COMPANIES
    Majtanova, Anna
    Snopkova, Andrea
    [J]. FINANCE AND PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS IN SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE, 2015, : 903 - 918
  • [3] Relative valuation of US insurance companies
    Nissim, Doron
    [J]. REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2013, 18 (02) : 324 - 359
  • [4] Investment Decisions and Profitability under the Financial Valuation in the Large Industrial Companies of the Cotopaxi province, Ecuador
    Caiza Pastuna, Erika Cristina
    Valencia Nunez, Edison Roberto
    Bedoya Jara, Mayra Patricia
    [J]. REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD EMPRESA, 2020, 22 (39):
  • [5] VALUATION STANDARDS FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES IN THE FINANCIAL THEORY
    Hrdy, Milan
    Duchackova, Eva
    [J]. PRAGUE ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2017, 26 (02): : 227 - 239
  • [6] Factors Influencing Investment Decisions in Financial Investment Companies
    Abdul Kareem, Ahmed Amer
    Fayed, Zaki T.
    Rady, Sherine
    Amin El-Regaily, Salsabil
    Nema, Bashar M.
    [J]. SYSTEMS, 2023, 11 (03):
  • [7] Investment decisions of companies in financial distress
    Lopez-Gutierrez, Carlos
    Sanfilippo-Azofra, Sergio
    Torre-Olmo, Begona
    [J]. BRQ-BUSINESS RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2015, 18 (03) : 174 - 187
  • [8] INVESTMENT VALUATION AND PERFORMANCE OF WOOD PROCESSING COMPANIES IN SLOVAKIA
    Merkova, M.
    Drabek, J.
    [J]. MORE WOOD, BETTER MANAGEMENT, INCREASING EFFECTIVENESS: STARTING POINTS AND PERSPECTIVE, 2017, : 86 - 92
  • [9] Relative valuation of U.S. insurance companies
    Doron Nissim
    [J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2013, 18 : 324 - 359
  • [10] FINANCIAL REPORTING OF REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANIES - SURVEY
    NEEDLES, BE
    HAVIS, KR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY, 1971, 131 (01): : 52 - 59