Transmission and Wind Investment in a Deregulated Electricity Industry

被引:41
|
作者
Maurovich-Horvat, Lajos [1 ]
Boomsma, Trine K. [2 ]
Siddiqui, Afzal S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London, England
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Math Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Comp & Syst Sci, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Market design; mathematical programming with equilibrium constraints (MPEC); transmission; wind power; POWER; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2367107
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Adoption of dispersed renewable energy technologies requires transmission network expansion. Besides the transmission system operator (TSO), restructuring of electricity industries has introduced a merchant investor (MI), who earns congestion rents from constructing new lines. We compare these two market designs via a stochastic bi-level programming model that has either the MI or the TSO making transmission investment decisions at the upper level and power producers determining generation investment and operation at the lower level while facing wind power variability. We find that social welfare is always higher under the TSO because the MI has incentive to boost congestion rents by restricting capacities of transmission lines. Such strategic behavior also limits investment in wind power by producers. However, regardless of the market design (MI or TSO), when producers behave a la Cournot, a higher proportion of energy is produced by wind. In effect, withholding of generation capacity by producers prompts more transmission investment since the TSO aims to increase welfare by subsidizing wind and the MI creates more flow to maximize profit.
引用
收藏
页码:1633 / 1643
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The competitive effects of transmission capacity in a deregulated electricity industry
    Borenstein, S
    Bushnell, J
    Stoft, S
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 31 (02): : 294 - 325
  • [2] The competitive effects of ownership of financial transmission rights in a deregulated electricity industry
    Joung, Manho
    Baldick, Ross
    Son, You Seok
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (02): : 165 - 184
  • [3] Coordinated generation and transmission expansion planning in deregulated electricity market considering wind farms
    Hemmati, Reza
    Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah
    Khodabakhshian, Amin
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 85 : 620 - 630
  • [4] Ambiguities and nonmonotonicities under prosumer powerOptimal distributed energy resource investment in a deregulated electricity industry
    Afzal S. Siddiqui
    Sauleh A. Siddiqui
    [J]. TOP, 2022, 30 : 492 - 532
  • [5] Transmission Loss Allocation Based on Harmonic Factor Distortion in Deregulated Electricity Supply Industry
    Nojeng, S.
    Hassan, M. Y.
    Abdullah, M. P.
    Hussin, F.
    [J]. 2012 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ISIEA 2012), 2012,
  • [6] Generation Investment and Risks Modeling in a Deregulated Electricity Market
    Limbu, Tika Ram
    Saha, Tapan K.
    McDonald, John D. F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS, 2010, 11 (03):
  • [7] Reactive power pricing in a deregulated electricity industry
    Mandal, K. K.
    Kar, B.
    Pal, D.
    Basu, M.
    Chakraborty, N.
    [J]. IPEC: 2005 INTERNATIONAL POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2005, : 853 - 858
  • [8] Hedging with futures contracts in a deregulated electricity industry
    Tanlapco, E
    Lawarrée, J
    Liu, CC
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (03) : 577 - 582
  • [9] Ambiguities and nonmonotonicities under prosumer power Optimal distributed energy resource investment in a deregulated electricity industry
    Siddiqui, Afzal S.
    Siddiqui, Sauleh A.
    [J]. TOP, 2022, 30 (03) : 492 - 532
  • [10] Portfolio optimization in transmission investment in deregulated market
    Lee, C. W.
    Ng, Simon K. K.
    Zhong, J.
    [J]. 2007 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-10, 2007, : 865 - +