Vulnerability assessment and management planning for the ecological environment in urban wetlands

被引:52
|
作者
Yang, Xiao [1 ]
Liu, Sen [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Chao [1 ]
Liu, Yang [3 ]
Yu, Cuicui [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Inst Marine Sci & Technol, Binhai Rd 72, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Resources & Hydraul En, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Inst Surveying & Mapping Geol, Jinan 250002, Peoples R China
关键词
Urban wetland; Environmental management; Vulnerability assessment; FDAHP; Kmeans plus; NATIONAL NATURE-RESERVE; YELLOW-RIVER DELTA; RISK-ASSESSMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; DECISION-MAKING; COASTAL WETLAND; K-MEANS; GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; ECONOMIC VALUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113540
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As a special ecosystem in cities, urban wetland parks have important environmental regulation and social service functions. This paper proposes a new methodology of urban wetland planning and management based on the vulnerability of the ecological environment. The Jixi National Wetland Park (JNWP) was taken as the research area to analyze the ecological, geological and environmental factors that affect urban wetlands. A remote sensing image, digital elevation model, and environmental quality interpolation processing were used to generate the factor layer, and a comprehensive evaluation index system was established. The fuzzy Delphi analytic hierarchy process (FDAHP) method was used to calculate the comprehensive weight of each evaluation factor. A model to evaluate the ecological environment vulnerability of the JNWP was established. Then, an improved k-means clustering algorithm was used to classify the ecological environment of the study area. The ecological environment vulnerability of the wetland was evaluated. The results showed that the vulnerability of the ecological environment in the study area could be divided into five levels, including very low, low, medium, high and very high vulnerability areas. According to the vulnerability level and the results of k-means++ cluster analysis, the JNWP is divided into five areas. The wetland buffer zone is the main factor that determines the distribution of ecological environment vulnerability in urban wetlands. However, cultivated land development and ecological environmental restoration are the main factors that determine the evolution of ecological environment vulnerability in urban wetlands. The FDAHP and geographic information systems (GIS), combined with cluster analysis, are effective methods to evaluate the vulnerability of the ecological environment of urban wetlands, which provides a scientific and accurate methodology for the management and sustainable development of urban wetlands.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Urban ecological novelty assessment: Implications for urban green infrastructure planning and management
    Teixeira, Catarina Patoilo
    Fernandes, Claudia Oliveira
    Ahern, Jack
    Honrado, Joao Pradinho
    Farinha-Marques, Paulo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 773
  • [2] Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management
    He, Li
    Shen, Jing
    Zhang, Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 206 : 1115 - 1125
  • [3] Evaluation and planning of urban geological and ecological environment quality
    Lu C.
    Shi L.
    Zhao X.
    Li W.
    Gustavel Q.
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (2)
  • [4] The Assessment of Urban Ecological Environment in Watershed Scale
    Wang, Chaojun
    Zhao, Hongrui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOGRAPHIES OF HEALTH AND LIVING IN CITIES: MAKING CITIES HEALTHY FOR ALL, 2016, 36 : 169 - 175
  • [5] Urban Ecological Structure: urban planning and management in Mexico City
    Filipe Narciso, Carla
    [J]. ESTOA-REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE ARQUITECTURA Y URBANISMO DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE CUENCA, 2018, 7 (12): : 137 - 147
  • [6] Planning for ecological drought: Integrating ecosystem services and vulnerability assessment
    Raheem, Nejem
    Cravens, Amanda E.
    Cross, Molly S.
    Crausbay, Shelley
    Ramirez, Aaron
    McEvoy, Jamie
    Zoanni, Dionne
    Bathke, Deborah J.
    Hayes, Michael
    Carter, Shawn
    Rubenstein, Madeleine
    Schwend, Ann
    Hall, Kimberly
    Suberu, Paul
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2019, 6 (04):
  • [7] ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENT OF AN AREA'S SOCIAL VULNERABILITY: ECOLOGICAL ASPECT
    Mulska, Olha
    Vasyltsiv, Taras
    Levytska, Olha
    Osinska, Oksana
    Kunytska-Iliash, Marta
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS-INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC E-JOURNAL, 2022, 8 (03): : 60 - 80
  • [8] Ecological Environment Vulnerability and Driving Force of Yangtze River Urban Agglomeration
    Peng, Benhong
    Huang, Qianqian
    Elahi, Ehsan
    Wei, Guo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (23)
  • [9] Impact of social vulnerability assessment on flood risk management processes in the urban environment in Annaba province
    Kesmia, Djamaleddine
    Zennir, Rabah
    Dovbash, Nadiia
    Benselhoub, Aissa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY GEOGRAPHY AND GEOECOLOGY, 2023, 32 (03): : 502 - 515
  • [10] The Correlation of Geo-Ecological Environment and Mountain Urban planning
    Yang, Chun
    Zeng, Wei
    [J]. 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MATERIAL APPLICATION (ESMA2017), VOLS 1-4, 2018, 108