Evaluating tomato production in open-field and high-tech greenhouse systems

被引:41
|
作者
Maureira, Fidel [1 ]
Rajagopalan, Kirti [1 ]
Stockle, Claudio O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Tomato production; High-tech greenhouse; Open-field tomato production; Water; Energy; And greenhouse gas footprint; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FOOD DEMAND; ENERGY; WATER; DESIGN; MODEL; CROPSYST; METHODOLOGY; CULTIVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130459
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
High-tech greenhouse production of vegetables has been proposed as a path to sustainable intensification of food production. While these systems have clear productivity advantages, there are outstanding questions around their overall sustainability that merit evaluation. Using a simulation approach, we assessed crop yields, water, energy, and greenhouse gas footprints, average cost per unit of tomato produced, and net income for Washington State, United States as a case study. Compared to open-field production, high-tech greenhouse resulted in 6.4 times yield per unit area with 231 times energy, 18 times greenhouse gas, and 0.74 times water footprints (per unit of fresh tomato mass). Greenhouse tomato cultivation would need to focus on both reducing the energy needs and shifting to cleaner sources to reduce environmental impacts and lead to sustainable intensification of food production.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental analysis of soilless tomato production in a high-tech greenhouse
    D'Amico, Antonia
    De Boni, Annalisa
    Palmisano, Giovanni Ottomano
    Acciani, Claudio
    Roma, Rocco
    [J]. CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 11
  • [2] Comparing the Environmental Impacts of Greenhouse versus Open-Field Tomato Production in the Mediterranean Region
    Munoz, P.
    Anton, A.
    Nunez, M.
    Paranjpe, A.
    Arino, J.
    Castells, X.
    Montero, J. I.
    Rieradevall, J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH TECHNOLOGY FOR GREENHOUSE SYSTEM MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, (801): : 1591 - +
  • [3] The environmental performance of greenhouse versus open-field cherry production systems in China
    Shen, Junyi
    Zhang, Pengpeng
    Chang, Yuan
    Zhang, Lixiao
    Hao, Yan
    Tang, Shoujuan
    Xiong, Xin
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 28 : 736 - 748
  • [4] Evaluation of sustainability in strawberry crops production under greenhouse and open-field systems in the Andes
    Cayambe, Jhenny
    Heredia-R, Marco
    Torres, Emma
    Puhl, Laura
    Torres, Bolier
    Barreto, Deniz
    Heredia, Biviana N.
    Vaca-Lucero, Andrea
    Diaz-Ambrona, Carlos G. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [5] Energy and cost analysis for greenhouse and open-field grape production
    Ozkan, Burhan
    Fert, Cemal
    Karadeniz, C. Feyza
    [J]. ENERGY, 2007, 32 (08) : 1500 - 1504
  • [6] Economic Profitability of Growing Lettuce and Tomato in Western Washington under High Tunnel and Open-field Production Systems
    Galinato, Suzette P.
    Miles, Carol A.
    [J]. HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 23 (04) : 453 - 461
  • [7] 'VL Tamatar 4': New Tomato Cultivar for Open-field and Greenhouse Cultivation
    Hedau, Nirmal K.
    Dhar, Shri
    Mahajan, Vinay
    Agarwal, Pawan K.
    Bhatt, Jagdish C.
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 2014, 49 (01) : 105 - 106
  • [8] ENERGY ANALYSIS FOR GREENHOUSE AND OPEN FIELD TOMATO PRODUCTION
    Djevic, M.
    Dimitrijevic, Aleksandra
    [J]. ACTUAL TASKS ON AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 37 : 347 - 353
  • [9] ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF THE OPEN FIELD AND GREENHOUSE TOMATO PRODUCTION
    Djevic, Milan
    Dimitrijevic, Aleksandra
    [J]. ACTUAL TASKS ON AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 38 : 245 - 253
  • [10] Economic Profitability of Producing Tomato and Lettuce in Western Washington under Open-Field and High-Tunnel Production Systems©
    Galinato, Suzette P.
    Miles, Carol A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL PLANT PROPAGATORS SOCIETY, 2015, 1085 : 353 - 353