A Study of the Factors Affecting Multimodal Ridesharing with Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
An, Sunghi [1 ]
Nam, Daisik [2 ]
Jayakrishnan, R. [1 ]
Lee, Soongbong [3 ]
McNally, Michael G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Inst Transportat Studies, Irvine, CA 92603 USA
[2] Inha Univ, Grad Sch Logist, Incheon 22212, South Korea
[3] Korea Transport Inst, Dept Big Data Platform & Data Econ, Sejong 30147, South Korea
关键词
multimodal ridesharing; conjoint survey design; choice-based conjoint analysis; multinomial logit model; factor estimation analysis; choice behavior;
D O I
10.3390/su132011517
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As public perception about the shared economy evolves, peer-to-peer ridesharing has been gaining increased attention worldwide. Both private and public sector entities have launched mobile app-based ridesharing services, while a range of methodologies and system architectures have been proposed in academia. Whereas traditional ridesharing methods match drivers and riders when their origin and destination are similar, recently proposed algorithms often feature multi-hop and multimodal properties that allow riders to be connected by multiple modes. Such algorithms can reduce travel time and/or travel cost; however, they may also add other travel impedances, such as requiring multiple transfers. Understanding user behavior toward such new ridesharing systems is essential for successful service design. For policymakers and service planners, identifying factors that impact traveler choices can lead to better design and improved services. This research involved a web-based survey to capture traveler preferences using a conjoint analysis framework. A choice-based method was adopted to identify factors for the estimation model and to analyze traveler willingness to pay. Among the proposed factors, the number-of-transfers was shown to be the most important, as was expected. When a multimodal ridesharing system provides less travel time, low travel cost, and sufficient ridesharing incentive, people are more likely to pay for the service.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multimodal preference heterogeneity in choice-based conjoint analysis: a simulation study
    Goeken N.
    Kurz P.
    Steiner W.J.
    [J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2024, 94 (1) : 137 - 185
  • [2] Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis: Models and Designs
    Wang, Xin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 55 (04) : 328 - 329
  • [3] Factors Associated with Pediatric Dentists' Choice of Amalgam: Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Approach
    Bakhurji, E.
    Scott, T.
    Sohn, W.
    [J]. JDR CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 4 (03) : 246 - 254
  • [4] Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis
    Toubia, O
    Hauser, JR
    Simester, DI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2004, 41 (01) : 116 - 131
  • [5] The Strategic Implications of Scale in Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
    Hauser, John R.
    Eggers, Felix
    Selove, Matthew
    [J]. MARKETING SCIENCE, 2019, 38 (06) : 1059 - 1081
  • [6] Ellipsoidal Methods for Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
    Saure, Denis
    Vielma, Juan Pablo
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 67 (02) : 315 - 338
  • [7] The Effects of Incentives in a Choice-Based Conjoint Pricing Study
    Ye, Hongjun
    Bhatt, Siddharth
    Zhong, Wenting
    Watson, Jan
    Sargent, Amanda
    Topoglu, Yigit
    Ayaz, Hasan
    Suri, Rajneesh
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEUROERGONOMICS AND COGNITIVE ENGINEERING, 2020, 953 : 84 - 90
  • [8] Bureaucracy and policymaking: Evidence from a choice-based conjoint analysis
    Batista, Mariana
    [J]. RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2023, 10 (03)
  • [9] An approach to improve the predictive power of choice-based conjoint analysis
    Voleti, Sudhir
    Srinivasan, V.
    Ghosh, Pulak
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2017, 34 (02) : 325 - 335
  • [10] SCREENING FOR INTERACTIONS BETWEEN DESIGN FACTORS AND DEMOGRAPHICS IN CHOICE-BASED CONJOINT
    CHAKRABORTY, G
    WOODWORTH, G
    GAETH, GJ
    ETTENSON, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1991, 23 (03) : 219 - 237