Performance of EIA authority and effectiveness of EIA system in Pakistan

被引:21
|
作者
Khan, Mehreen [1 ]
Chaudhry, Muhammad Nawaz [2 ]
Ahmad, Sajid Rashid [1 ]
Saif, Samia [3 ]
Mehmood, Asim [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Punjab, Coll Earth & Environm Sci, Dept Environm Sci, Lahore, Pakistan
[2] Lahore Sch Econ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Barki Rd, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Environm Consultancies & Opt, 3rd Floor,31 Commercial Area, Lahore, Pakistan
[4] Global ECO Lab, 2nd & 3rd Floor,4-5 Commercial Area, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Capacities; EIA; EPA; Procedural effectiveness; Performance; Punjab; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT; CONSULTANTS; CHALLENGES; QUALITY; IMPLEMENTATION; CAPACITIES; AGENCY; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106357
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) agencies worldwide face multiple challenges that compromise their performance and in turn EIA procedural effectiveness. The current study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Punjab, Pakistan and the problems it faces whilst implementing EIA and ensuring EIA effectiveness. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data for the study. EPA performance and procedural effectiveness were evaluated using the formal and informal roles of EPA and EIA good practices respectively. They were also linked to regulatory framework, capacities of actors and contextual factors. Study found that EPA and EIA system performance is weak. Consequently, procedural effectiveness is compromised. The main causes include limited capacities of EPA, consultants and proponents; lack of political will; political interference and outdated regulations. A strong political will of the government is required to enhance the capacity of EPA and other actors in terms of motivation or "the will to" and means or "the ability to". Measures taken by international EIA agencies to improve performance and effectiveness have also been discussed. Based on this study, lessons can be learnt by not only EPA Punjab but also other agencies in Pakistan and international agencies facing similar challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An evaluation of EIA system performance in Turkey in the context of procedural effectiveness
    Colakkadioglu, Deniz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPERTY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2021, 13 (03) : 185 - 202
  • [2] Theorising EIA effectiveness: A contribution based on the Danish system
    Lyhne, Ivar
    van Laerhoven, Frank
    Cashmore, Matthew
    Runhaar, Hens
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 62 : 240 - 249
  • [3] Benefits and drawbacks of EIA decentralisation in Pakistan
    Khan, Mehreen
    Chaudhry, Muhammad Nawaz
    Saif, Samia
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2022, 97
  • [4] An evaluation of EIA system performance in eight EU countries
    Barker, A
    Wood, C
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 1999, 19 (04) : 387 - 404
  • [5] Evaluating environmental impact assessment (EIA) in the countries along the belt and road initiatives: System effectiveness and the compatibility with the Chinese EIA
    Aung, Thiri Shwesin
    Fischer, Thomas B.
    Luan Shengji
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 81
  • [6] An evaluation of EIA system performance in eight EU countries
    University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
    不详
    [J]. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 4 (387-404):
  • [7] EIA: EIA ergonomics training at WasteExpo
    Anon
    [J]. Waste Age, 2001, 32 (03):
  • [8] An evaluation framework for effective public participation in EIA in Pakistan
    Nadeem, Obaidullah
    Fischer, Thomas B.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2011, 31 (01) : 36 - 47
  • [9] Overcoming low EIA performance - A diagnostic tool for the deliberate development of EIA system capacities in low and middle income countries
    Kolhoff, Arend J.
    Driessen, Peter P. J.
    Runhaar, Hens A. C.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2018, 68 : 98 - 108
  • [10] An administrative justice perspective on improving EIA effectiveness
    Retief, Francois P.
    Fischer, Thomas B.
    Alberts, Reece C.
    Roos, Claudine
    Cilliers, Dirk P.
    [J]. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2020, 38 (02) : 151 - 155