Using source-specific models to test the impact of sediment source classification on sediment fingerprinting

被引:12
|
作者
Vercruysse, Kim [1 ,2 ]
Grabowski, Robert C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Water Energy & Environm, Cranfield Water Sci Inst, Bedford MK43 0AL, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Civil Engn, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
discrimination; DRIFTS; fine sediment; partial least-squares regression; sediment tracing; sensitivity analysis; source apportionment; source identification; DIFFUSE-REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY; URBAN RIVER-BASINS; SUSPENDED SEDIMENT; FINE SEDIMENT; PARTICLE-SIZE; SOURCE DISCRIMINATION; CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT; FLUVIAL SYSTEMS; MIXING MODELS; FRENCH ALPS;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.13269
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Sediment fingerprinting estimates sediment source contributions directly from river sediment. Despite being fundamental to the interpretation of sediment fingerprinting results, the classification of sediment sources and its impact on the accuracy of source apportionment remain underinvestigated. This study assessed the impact of source classification on sediment fingerprinting based on diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectrometry (DRIFTS), using individual, source-specific partial least-squares regression (PLSR) models. The objectives were to (a) perform a model sensitivity analysis through systematically omitting sediment sources and (b) investigate how sediment source-group discrimination and the importance of the groups as actual sources relate to variations in results. Within the Aire catchment (United Kingdom), five sediment sources were classified and sampled (n=117): grassland topsoil in three lithological areas (limestone, millstone grit, and coal measures); riverbanks; and street dust. Experimental mixtures (n=54) of the sources were used to develop PLSR models between known quantities of a single source and DRIFTS spectra of the mixtures, which were applied to estimate source contributions from DRIFTS spectra of suspended (n=200) and bed (n=5) sediment samples. Dominant sediment sources were limestone topsoil (45 +/- 12%) and street dust (43 +/- 10%). Millstone and coals topsoil contributed on average 19 +/- 13% and 14 +/- 10%, and riverbanks 16 +/- 18%. Due to the use of individual PLSR models, the sum of all contributions can deviate from 100%; thus, a model sensitivity analysis assessed the impact and accuracy of source classification. Omitting less important sources (e.g., coals topsoil) did not change the contributions of other sources, whereas omitting important, poorly-discriminated sources (e.g., riverbank) increased the contributions of all sources. In other words, variation in source classification substantially alters source apportionment depending on source discrimination and source importance. These results will guide development of procedures for evaluating the appropriate type and number of sediment sources in DRIFTS-PLSR sediment fingerprinting.
引用
收藏
页码:3402 / 3415
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of catchment source group classification on the accuracy of sediment fingerprinting outputs
    Pulley, Simon
    Foster, Ian
    Collins, Adrian L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 194 : 16 - 26
  • [2] Sediment source fingerprinting and the temporal variability of source contributions
    Liu, Ying
    Walling, Des E.
    Yang, Mingyi
    Zhang, Fengbao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 338
  • [3] Storm event sediment fingerprinting for temporal and spatial sediment source tracing
    Vale, Simon S.
    Fuller, Ian C.
    Procter, Jonathan N.
    Basher, Les R.
    Dymond, John R.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2020, 34 (15) : 3370 - 3386
  • [4] Sediment Fingerprinting to Determine the Source of Suspended Sediment in a Southern Piedmont Stream
    Mukundan, R.
    Radcliffe, D. E.
    Ritchie, J. C.
    Risse, L. M.
    McKinley, R. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2010, 39 (04) : 1328 - 1337
  • [5] How to evaluate sediment fingerprinting source apportionments
    P. V. G. Batista
    J. P. Laceby
    O. Evrard
    [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2022, 22 : 1315 - 1328
  • [6] How to evaluate sediment fingerprinting source apportionments
    Batista, P. V. G.
    Laceby, J. P.
    Evrard, O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2022, 22 (04) : 1315 - 1328
  • [7] Selecting Color-based Tracers and Classifying Sediment Sources in the Assessment of Sediment Dynamics Using Sediment Source Fingerprinting
    Barthod, Louise R. M.
    Liu, Kui
    Lobb, David A.
    Owens, Philip N.
    Martinez-Carreras, Nuria
    Koiter, Alexander J.
    Petticrew, Ellen L.
    McCullough, Gregory K.
    Liu, Cenwei
    Gaspar, Leticia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2015, 44 (05) : 1605 - 1616
  • [8] Are source groups always appropriate when sediment fingerprinting? The direct comparison of source and sediment samples as a methodological step
    Pulley, S.
    Van der Waal, B.
    Collins, A. L.
    Foster, I. D. L.
    Rowntree, K.
    [J]. RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2017, 33 (10) : 1553 - 1563
  • [9] Sensitivity of source sediment fingerprinting to tracer selection methods
    Chalaux-Clergue, Thomas
    Bizeul, Remi
    Batista, Pedro V. G.
    Martinez-Carreras, Nuria
    Laceby, J. Patrick
    Evrard, Olivier
    [J]. SOIL, 2024, 10 (01) : 109 - 138
  • [10] Application of the Bayesian approach to sediment fingerprinting and source attribution
    Davies, Joe
    Olley, Jon
    Hawker, Darryl
    McBroom, James
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2018, 32 (26) : 3978 - 3995