Effects of substrate modification on the interfacial adhesion of acrylic elastomers

被引:43
|
作者
Ahn, D
Shull, KR [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/la9713964
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Axisymmetric adhesion tests are used to probe the adhesion between a carboxylated, poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PNBA) elastomer and a variety of substrates. The elastomer is in the form of a hemispherical cap, which is pressed against a flat substrate to give a circular contact area. A standard fracture mechanics approach is used to relate the applied load and the radius of the contact area to the energy release rate, g which can be viewed as an adhesion energy. For a given substrate, g is a function of the crack velocity, v, defined as the time derivative of the contact radius. The contact pressure does not appear to play a role in the development of the adhesive forces, and the specific relationship between g and v depends on the substrate. In all cases this relationship can be adequately described by the empirical expression, g(v) = g(o)(l + (v/v*)(0.6)). Values of g(o) are within a factor of about 2 of the expected thermodynamic work of adhesion, but values of v* vary from 5.5 to 215 nm/s, depending on the detailed nature of the substrate. Decreases in the adhesion energy, as quantified by a decrease in g(o) and/or an increase in v* are determined primarily by the segmental mobility of the substrate molecules. Comparison of results for free and grafted PNBA chains indicates that translational diffusion of molecules at the substrate is not required in order to substantially reduce the adhesion energy.
引用
收藏
页码:3646 / 3654
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of an elastic substrate on the interfacial adhesion of thin films
    Li, XF
    SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 200 (16-17): : 5003 - 5008
  • [2] Bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers to an acrylic substrate
    Hatamleh, Muhanad M.
    Watts, David C.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2010, 26 (04) : 387 - 395
  • [3] Influence of weathering and substrate roughness on the interfacial adhesion of acrylic coating based on an increasing load scratch test
    Seo, Tae-Won
    Weon, Jong-Il
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2012, 47 (05) : 2234 - 2240
  • [4] Influence of weathering and substrate roughness on the interfacial adhesion of acrylic coating based on an increasing load scratch test
    Tae-Won Seo
    Jong-Il Weon
    Journal of Materials Science, 2012, 47 : 2234 - 2240
  • [5] ADHESION AND PROPERTIES OF ACRYLIC POLYMERS AT THEIR INTERFACE WITH SUBSTRATE
    VORONIN, IV
    LAVRENTIEV, VV
    VYSOKOMOLEKULYARNYE SOEDINENIYA SERIYA A, 1979, 21 (08): : 1742 - 1750
  • [6] Effect of acrylic diblock copolymer upon interfacial adhesion
    Wootthikanokkhan, J
    Burford, RP
    Chaplin, RP
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 1996, 62 (05) : 835 - 844
  • [7] Effects of interfacial modification for vapor phase polymerized PEDOT on glass substrate
    Li, Boxiao
    Skorenko, Kenneth H.
    Qiu, Haian
    Mativetsky, Jeffrey M.
    Dwyer, Derek B.
    Bernier, William E.
    Jones, Wayne E., Jr.
    SYNTHETIC METALS, 2020, 260
  • [8] Chemically Coupled Interfacial Adhesion in Multimaterial Printing of Hydrogels and Elastomers
    Tian, Kevin
    Suo, Zhigang
    Vlassak, Joost J.
    ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, 2020, 12 (27) : 31002 - 31009
  • [9] Effects of High Temperature Immersion on Interfacial Adhesion between Polypropylene and Nickel Substrate
    Zhang, Yifan
    Hu, Ying
    Shen, Jiabin
    Guo, Shaoyun
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2019, 58 (31) : 14139 - 14145
  • [10] Effects on interfacial properties and cell adhesion of surface modification by pectic hairy regions
    Morra, M
    Cassinelli, C
    Cascardo, G
    Nagel, MD
    Della Volpe, C
    Siboni, S
    Maniglio, D
    Brugnara, M
    Ceccone, G
    Schols, HA
    Ulvskov, P
    BIOMACROMOLECULES, 2004, 5 (06) : 2094 - 2104