A randomised controlled trial of delayed antibiotic prescribing as a strategy for managing uncomplicated respiratory tract infection in primary care

被引:0
|
作者
Dowell, J [1 ]
Pitkethly, M [1 ]
Bain, J [1 ]
Martin, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Tayside Ctr Gen Practice, Dundee DD2 4AD, Scotland
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2001年 / 51卷 / 464期
关键词
antibiotic prescribing; uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection; cough; consultation behaviour; patient enablement; patient satisfaction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Despite evidence that uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection (cough) does nor respond appreciably to antibiotics and that bacterial resistance is increasing, general practitioners (GPs) still prescribe frequently. Aim: To assess delayed antibiotic prescribing as a strategy for reducing the unnecessary use of antibiotics for cough in primary care. Design of study: Open randomised controlled trial of delayed versus immediate prescribing of antibiotics. Setting: One hundred and ninety-one adult patients with uncomplicated cough in 22 Scottish practices who would have received antibiotics under the GP's usual practice were randomised to receive either an immediate prescription (92 patients) or a delayed prescription (99 patients). Method: Delayed subjects were asked to wait a week before deciding whether to collect their prescription. Outcome measures included symptom duration, prescription uptake, patient satisfaction, patient enablement, and subsequent consultation rates. The 48 GPs who recruited patients were surveyed six months after the trial to see whether they used delayed prescribing as a part of their normal practice. Results: Study and control groups were similar at baseline. Of the subjects in the delayed arm, 55% did not pick up their prescription. Although most patients were satisfied more patients in the immediate arm were very satisfied with the treatment (P = 0.001) and the consultation (P = 0.03). The patients in the immediate arm Ir ere also more enabled (3.3 versus 2.4; P = 0.04), although more of them intended to consult for similar complaints in the future (85% versus 69%, P = 0.02). We were unable to detect any difference in actual consulting behaviour in the follow-up period (mean = 15 months [SD = 5 months]). Subsequently, 68% of GPs used delayed prescribing at least monthly; all gave the prescription to the patient. Conclusion: Delayed prescribing is effective at reducing the use of antibiotics for self-limiting cough; however, patients are less satisfied and enabled as a result. Patients may be deterred from consulting rather than becoming enabled.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 205
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Delayed antibiotic prescribing strategies for respiratory tract infections in primary care: pragmatic, factorial, randomised controlled trial
    Little, Paul
    Moore, Michael
    Kelly, Jo
    Williamson, Ian
    Leydon, Geraldine
    McDermott, Lisa
    Mullee, Mark
    Stuart, Beth
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [2] Effectiveness of a multiple intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract symptoms in primary care: randomised controlled trial
    Welschen, I
    Kuyvenhoven, MM
    Hoes, AW
    Verheij, TJM
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7463): : 431 - 433
  • [3] Antibiotic Prescribing and Outcomes of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in UK Primary Care
    Winchester, Christopher C.
    Macfarlane, Tatiana V.
    Thomas, Mike
    Price, David
    [J]. CHEST, 2009, 135 (05) : 1163 - 1172
  • [4] Feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a within-consultation intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for children presenting to primary care with acute respiratory tract infection and cough
    Blair, Peter S.
    Turnbull, Sophie
    Ingram, Jenny
    Redmond, Niamh
    Lucas, Patricia Jane
    Cabral, Christie
    Hollinghurst, Sandra
    Dixon, Padraig
    Peters, Tim
    Horwood, Jeremy
    Little, Paul
    Francis, Nick A.
    Gilbertson, Anna
    Jameson, Catherine
    Hay, Alastair D.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (05):
  • [5] Understanding the delayed prescribing of antibiotics for respiratory tract infection in primary care: a qualitative analysis
    Ryves, R.
    Eyles, C.
    Moore, M.
    McDermott, L.
    Little, P.
    Leydon, G. M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (11):
  • [6] Effect of using an interactive booklet about childhood respiratory tract infections in primary care consultations on reconsulting and antibiotic prescribing: a cluster randomised controlled trial
    Francis, Nick A.
    Butler, Christopher C.
    Hood, Kerenza
    Simpson, Sharon
    Wood, Fiona
    Nuttall, Jacqueline
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 : 374 - 376
  • [7] Dipsticks and point-of-care Microscopy to reduce antibiotic use in women with an uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection (MicUTI): protocol of a randomised controlled pilot trial in primary care
    Kurotschka, Peter K.
    Borgulya, Gabor
    Bucher, Eva
    Endrich, Isabell
    Figueiras, Adolfo
    Gensichen, Jochen
    Hay, Alastair D.
    Hapfelmeier, Alexander
    Kretzschmann, Christian
    Kurzai, Oliver
    Lam, Thien-Tri
    Massidda, Orietta
    Sanftenberg, Linda
    Schmiemann, Guido
    Schneider, Antonius
    Simmenroth, Anne
    Stark, Stefanie
    Warkentin, Lisette
    Ebell, Mark H.
    Gagyor, Ildiko
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [8] Antibiotic prescribing practice for acute, uncomplicated respiratory tract infections in primary care settings in New Delhi, India
    Kotwani, Anita
    Holloway, Kathleen
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2014, 19 (07) : 761 - 768
  • [9] Clinical decision support algorithms for antibiotic prescribing for uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infection
    Chow, A.
    Lian, W.
    Aung, A. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 101 : 92 - 92
  • [10] Effects on antibiotic dispensing rates of interventions to promote delayed prescribing for respiratory tract infections in primary care
    Hoye, Sigurd
    Gjelstad, Svein
    Lindbk, Morten
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2013, 63 (616): : E777 - E786