International migration and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

被引:55
|
作者
Gagnon, Anita J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McDermott, Sarah [4 ]
Rigol-Chachamovich, Juliana [1 ]
Bandyopadhyay, Mridula [6 ]
Stray-Pedersen, Babill [7 ,8 ]
Stewart, Donna [5 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Sch Nursing, Montreal, PQ H3A 2A7, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Montreal, PQ H3A 2A7, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 2A7, Canada
[4] Publ Hlth Agcy Canada, Innovat & Trends Anal Div, Strateg Initiat & Innovat Directorate, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network Womens Hlth Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] La Trobe Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Oslo, Rikshosp, Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Women & Children, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
[8] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
关键词
gestational diabetes mellitus; migrants; IMPAIRED GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; NEW-SOUTH-WALES; RISK-FACTORS; WORKSHOP-CONFERENCE; PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; OBSTETRIC PROFILES; PUBLICATION BIAS; IMMIGRANT WOMEN; BIRTH OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01230.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Gagnon AJ, McDermott S, Rigol-Chachamovich J, Bandyopadhyay M, Stray-Pedersen B, Stewart D, for the ROAM Collaboration. International migration and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2011; 25: 575-592. Influxes of migrant women of childbearing age to receiving countries have made their perinatal health status a key priority for many governments. The international research collaboration Reproductive Outcomes And Migration(ROAM) reviewed published studies to assess whether migrants in countries of resettlement have a greater risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) than women in receiving countries. Asystematic review of the literature from Medline, Embase, PsychInfo and CINAHL from 1990 to 2009 included studies of migrant women and GDM. Studies were excluded if there was no cross-border movement or comparison group or if the receiving country was not the country of resettlement. Studies were assessed for quality, analysed descriptively and meta-analysed. Twenty-four reports (representing >120 000 migrants) met our inclusion criteria. Migrants were described primarily by geographic origin; other relevant aspects (e.g. time in country, language fluency) were rarely studied. Migrants' results for GDM were worse than those for receiving-country women in 79% of all studies. Meta-analyses showed that, compared with receiving-country women, Caribbean, African, European and Northern European women were at greater risk of GDM, while North Africans and North Americans had risks similar to receiving-country women. Although results of the 31 comparisons of Asians, East Africans or non-Australian Oceanians were too heterogeneous to provide a single GDM risk estimate for migrant women, only one comparison was below the receiving-country comparison group, all others presented a higher risk estimate. The majority of women migrants to resettlement countries are at greater risk for GDM than women resident in receiving countries. Research using clear, specific migrant definitions, adjusting for relevant risk factors and including other aspects of migration experiences is needed to confirm and understand these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 592
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Asymmetric dimethylarginine and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Patricia Tiong
    Logan Kosmider
    Zohra S. Lassi
    Margaret A. Arstall
    Prabha H. Andraweera
    [J]. Endocrine, 2023, 80 : 283 - 291
  • [2] Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Pakistan: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Muhammad Adnan
    Muhammad Aasim
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24
  • [3] Asymmetric dimethylarginine and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tiong, Patricia
    Kosmider, Logan
    Lassi, Zohra S.
    Arstall, Margaret A.
    Andraweera, Prabha H.
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2023, 80 (02) : 283 - 291
  • [4] Telemedicine interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rasekaba, Tshepo M.
    Furler, John
    Blackberry, Irene
    Tacey, Mark
    Gray, Kathleen
    Lim, Kwang
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 110 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [5] Gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mocellin, Lucas Pitrez
    Gomes, Hewellynn de Azeredo
    Sona, Lincoln
    Giacomini, Gabrielle Maria
    Pizzuti, Eduarda Pires
    Nunes, Gabrieli Borges
    Zanchet, Tulio Marcos
    de Macedo, Juliana Lopes
    [J]. CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2024, 40 (08):
  • [6] Homocysteine level and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Yang
    Deng, Hai-Yan
    Qiao, Zeng-Yong
    Gong, Fang-Xiao
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 (11) : 987 - 994
  • [7] A portrait of gestational diabetes mellitus in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Iser, Betine Pinto Moehlecke
    Stein, Caroline
    Alves, Luisia Feichas
    Carvalho, Morgana Lourenco de Souza
    Espinoza, Sergio Angelo Rojas
    Schmidt, Maria Ines
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM, 2022, 67 (06):
  • [8] Visfatin level and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yong-Kuan
    Deng, Hai-Yan
    Qiao, Zeng-Yong
    Gong, Fang-Xiao
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 127 (05) : 468 - 478
  • [9] GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS AND PLACENTAL WEIGHT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Arcot, Amrita
    Parks, Kalynn
    Beck, Celeste
    Gallagher, Kelly
    Gernand, Alison D.
    [J]. PLACENTA, 2023, 140 : E32 - E33
  • [10] Endometriosis and gestational diabetes mellitus risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Perez-Lopez, Faustino R.
    Martinez-Dominguez, Samuel J.
    Vinas, Andrea
    Perez-Tambo, Raquel
    Lafita, Alberto
    Lajusticia, Hector
    Chedraui, Peter
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 34 (05) : 363 - 369