Discordance between oncotype DX recurrence score and RSPC for predicting residual risk of recurrence in ER-positive breast cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Dodson, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
Okonji, David [3 ]
Assersohn, Laura [4 ]
Rigg, Anne [5 ]
Sheri, Amna [6 ]
Turner, Nick [3 ]
Smith, Ian [3 ]
Parton, Marina [3 ]
Dowsett, Mitch [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Ralph Lauren Ctr Breast Canc Res, Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JJ, England
[2] Inst Canc Res, 123 Old Brompton Rd, London SW7 3RP, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Breast Unit, Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JJ, England
[4] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[5] Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[6] Royal Free London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
关键词
Breast cancer; Oncotype DX; Recurrence score; RSPC; prognosis; Recurrence risk; PROGNOSTIC INDEX; CHEMOTHERAPY; WOMEN; ASSAY; EXPRESSION; TAMOXIFEN; THERAPY; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-017-4514-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Oncotype DX, a gene expression assay widely employed to aid decision making on adjuvant chemotherapy use in patients with primary oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, produces a recurrence score (RS) related to distant disease recurrence (DR) risk (RS%). In node-negative patients, RS can be integrated with clinicopathological parameters to derive RS-pathology-clinical (RSPC) that improves prognostic accuracy. Data were collected on patients having clinically indicated tests with an intermediate clinical risk of distant recurrence, and for whom the decision to prescribe chemotherapy remained unclear. Correlation between RS% and RSPC scores was examined. An agreement table was constructed using risk-categorised data. Association between RS%-derived categorical risk assignments and treatment recommendation was evaluated. Data on 171 tests (168 patients) were available. Median DR risk by RS% was 11% (range 3-34%), by RSPC it was 15% (range 4-63%). Correlation between RS% and RSPC was 0.702 (p < 0.001). RS% classified 57.3% of cases as low-, 32.2% intermediate- and 10.5% high-risk for DR; by RSPC proportions were 33.9, 35.7, and 30.4%, respectively. The number of patients receiving chemotherapy recommendations was: 14/87 (16.1%) categorised as low-risk by RS%, 27/49 (55.1%) as intermediate-risk and 12/13 (92.3%) as high-risk. Of 149 patients recommended for endocrine treatment alone, 28 (18.8%) were categorised by RS% as low-risk but by RSPC as intermediate- or high-risk. In this group of patients, RSPC assessed fewer patients as low-risk and more as high-risk than did RS%. The discordances between the scores indicate that RSPC estimates of risk should be considered when selecting patients for endocrine therapy alone.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 258
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discordance between oncotype DX recurrence score and RSPC for predicting residual risk of recurrence in ER-positive breast cancer
    Andrew Dodson
    David Okonji
    Laura Assersohn
    Anne Rigg
    Amna Sheri
    Nick Turner
    Ian Smith
    Marina Parton
    Mitch Dowsett
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 168 : 249 - 258
  • [2] Discordance in Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score Results for Bilateral Breast Cancer
    Bloom, J. A.
    Sekigami, Y.
    Cao, Y.
    Buchsbaum, R. J.
    Naber, S. P.
    Chatterjee, A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 1) : S51 - S51
  • [3] Discordance in Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® Results for Bilateral Breast Cancer
    Joshua A. Bloom
    Yurie Sekigami
    Rebekah Young
    Lisa Macera
    Christy A. Russell
    Yu Cao
    Rachel J. Buchsbaum
    Stephen P. Naber
    Abhishek Chatterjee
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 8711 - 8716
  • [4] Sex Disparity Observed for Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score in Predicting Mortality Among Patients with Early Stage ER-Positive Breast Cancer
    Wang, Fei
    Reid, Sonya
    Zheng, Wei
    Pal, Tuya
    Meszoely, Ingrid
    Mayer, Ingrid A.
    Bailey, Christina E.
    Park, Ben Ho
    Shu, Xiao-Ou
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (01) : 101 - 109
  • [5] Discordance in Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(R) Results for Bilateral Breast Cancer
    Bloom, Joshua A.
    Sekigami, Yurie
    Young, Rebekah
    Macera, Lisa
    Russell, Christy A.
    Cao, Yu
    Buchsbaum, Rachel J.
    Naber, Stephen P.
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (13) : 8711 - 8716
  • [6] A young woman with a small ER-positive breast cancer, a micrometastatic axillary lymph node, and an intermediate oncotype DX recurrence score
    Bowles, Daniel W.
    Rabinovitch, Rachel
    Borges, Virginia
    Urquhart, Alexander
    Singh, Meenakshi
    Finlayson, Christina
    Elias, Anthony
    [J]. ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2007, 21 (10): : 1212 - 1217
  • [7] Predicting late recurrence in ER-positive breast cancer
    Jack Cuzick
    [J]. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2019, 16 : 406 - 408
  • [8] Predicting late recurrence in ER-positive breast cancer
    Cuzick, Jack
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 16 (07) : 406 - 408
  • [9] The impact of the Oncotype DX recurrence score pathology-clinical (RSPC) on the predicted recurrence risk for node negative breast cancer patients: A cancer center experience
    Wexelman, Barbara A.
    Gallagher, Alexander
    Smith, Barbara L.
    Isakoff, Steven J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [10] Comparison of StemPrintER with Oncotype DX Recurrence Score for predicting risk of breast cancer distant recurrence after endocrine therapy
    Pece, Salvatore
    Sestak, Ivana
    Montani, Francesca
    Tillhon, Micol
    Maisonneuve, Patrick
    Freddi, Stefano
    Chu, Kim
    Colleoni, Marco
    Veronesi, Paolo
    Disalvatore, Davide
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Buus, Richard
    Cuzick, Jack
    Dowsett, Mitch
    Di Fiore, Pier Paolo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 164 : 52 - 61