Improving Understanding and Management of Uncertainty in Science-Informed Collaborative Policy Processes

被引:0
|
作者
Lilburne, Linda [1 ]
Robson-Williams, Melissa [1 ]
Norton, Ned [2 ]
机构
[1] Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, POB 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand
[2] Land Water People, POB 70, Lyttelton 8841, New Zealand
关键词
locations of uncertainty; unknowns; natural resource policy; collaborative process; KNOWLEDGE; ASSESSMENTS; CHALLENGES; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.3390/su14106041
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Decision making in natural resource management must deal with uncertainty. This can be very challenging when there is high uncertainty in the system being managed, particularly when participatory processes are used that potentially involve a wide range of stakeholders with competing interests and values, and where technical resources are limited. In the first phase of the research, a formal review of how uncertainty was managed in a collaborative and community-centred policy process to set water quality and water quantity limits in the Selwyn Waihora catchment in New Zealand. Three recommendations for improvement were identified: (i) increase the transparency of the nature and level of uncertainty considered, (ii) expand the types or sources of uncertainty considered, and (iii) apply a systemic and systematic approach to identifying and prioritising uncertainties. In the second phase, this led to the development of a five-stage conceptual framework incorporating a number of steps and tools designed to facilitate understanding, communicating, and managing uncertainty. The framework was tested and refined using the data from the original Selwyn Waihora policy process. This paper describes our framework, which was found to support understanding, managing, and communicating uncertainty in collaborative processes tasked with developing new environmental policy, despite time and resource constraints.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Science-informed policy tools for the Baltic Sea
    Chand, Annisa
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2021, 2 (01): : 6 - 6
  • [2] Science-informed policy tools for the Baltic Sea
    Annisa Chand
    [J]. Nature Food, 2021, 2 : 6 - 6
  • [3] Science-informed environmental management, policy, and decision-making: Year in review and a look forward
    Apitz, Sabine E.
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 19 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [4] Science-informed Policy Making for Protecting People and the Environment from Radiation
    Borrego, David
    Nagata, Jonathan S.
    Boyd, Michael A.
    DeCair, Sara D.
    Matakas, Lauren R.
    Wang, Ellen W.
    Pawel, David J.
    Ansari, Armin J.
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2024, 126 (06): : 367 - 373
  • [5] Data, knowledge, and modeling challenges for science-informed management of river deltas
    Schmitt, Rafael Jan Pablo
    Minderhoud, Philip Simon Johannes
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2023, 6 (03): : 216 - 235
  • [6] Toward science-informed public policy: A conceptual framework for contributing to and studying Great Lakes coastal shoreland management
    Norton, Richard K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2022, 48 (06) : 1345 - 1360
  • [7] Science-informed policy decisions lead to the creation of a protected area for a wide-ranging species at risk
    Leblond, Mathieu
    Rudolph, Tyler
    Boisjoly, Dominic
    Dussault, Christian
    St-Laurent, Martin-Hugues
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2022, 4 (12)
  • [8] The importance of science-informed policy and what the data really tell us about e-cigarettes
    Abrams, David B.
    Niaura, Raymond
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH, 2015, 4
  • [9] The importance of science-informed policy and what the data really tell us about e-cigarettes
    David B. Abrams
    Raymond Niaura
    [J]. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 4
  • [10] Uncertainty in biodiversity science, policy and management: a conceptual overview
    Haila, Yrjo
    Henle, Klaus
    [J]. NATURE CONSERVATION-BULGARIA, 2014, (08): : 27 - 43