Quantitative ecological risk assessment for fishing effects on diverse data-poor non-target species in a multi-sector and multi-gear fishery

被引:42
|
作者
Zhou, Shijie [1 ]
Smith, Anthony D. M. [2 ]
Fuller, Mike [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Marine & Atmospher Res, Wealth Oceans Natl Flagship, Cleveland, Qld 4163, Australia
[2] CSIRO Marine & Atmospher Res, Wealth Oceans Natl Flagship, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
Sustainability; Ecosystem approach to fisheries; Bycatch; Fishing mortality; Reference point; Trawl; Seine; Gillnet; Longline; Life history; Natural mortality; Spatial distribution; Rapid assessment; SOUTH-EAST FISHERY; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; EFFECTS SAFE; MANAGEMENT; AUSTRALIA; MORTALITY; IMPLEMENTATION; STRATEGIES; PARAMETERS; BYCATCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.fishres.2010.09.028
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Assessment of ecological sustainability for all species impacted by fishing is one of the most important and practical steps towards an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries. We extend methods for Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE) to assess diverse bycatch species in a multi-sector and multi-gear fishery. We develop methods for estimating fishing mortality rate, based on limited data, for demersal trawl. Danish seine, gillnet, and longline. The general approach involves estimating spatial overlap between species distribution and fishing effort distribution, catchability resulting from probability of encountering the gear and size-dependent selectivity, and post-capture mortality. We define three reference points (F-msm, F-lim, and F-crash) and use six methods to derive these reference points. As an example, we apply this method to nearly 500 fish species caught in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery, a multi-sector and multi-gear fishery in Australia. We assess sustainability risk for all captured fish species in each sub-fishery and the cumulative impact across all the sub-fisheries. The results indicate that chondrichthyans are more vulnerable to fishing impact than teleosts, and that impact differs among sectors of the fishery. This method could be easily applied to other fisheries. However, the results may require fine tuning by other means such as expert judgment. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 178
页数:11
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] A risk assessment and prioritisation approach to the selection of indicator species for the assessment of multi-species, multi-gear, multi-sector fishery resources
    Newman, Stephen J.
    Brown, Joshua I.
    Fairclough, David V.
    Wise, Brent S.
    Bellchambers, Lynda M.
    Molony, Brett W.
    Lenanton, Rodney C. J.
    Jackson, Gary
    Smith, Kim A.
    Gaughan, Daniel J.
    Fletcher, Warrick J.
    McAuley, Rory B.
    Wakefield, Corey B.
    MARINE POLICY, 2018, 88 : 11 - 22
  • [2] Effects of selective fishing on a small scale multi-species and multi-gear freshwater fishery in the Magdalena River Basin (Colombia)
    Hernandez Barrero, Sandra Jeannette
    Valderrama Barco, Mauricio
    Barreto Reyes, Carlos Guillermo
    Stotz, Wolfgang
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2021, 78 (12) : 1841 - 1854
  • [3] Managing non-target, data-poor species using catch limits: lessons from the Alaskan groundfish fishery
    Reuter, R. F.
    Conners, M. E.
    Dicosimo, J.
    Gaichas, S.
    Ormseth, O.
    Tenbrink, T. T.
    FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY, 2010, 17 (04) : 323 - 335
  • [4] Chronic effects of clothianidin to non-target soil invertebrates: Ecological risk assessment using the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) approach
    Bandeira, Felipe Ogliari
    Lopes Alves, Paulo Roger
    Hennig, Thuanne Braulio
    Brancalione, Juliane
    Nogueira, Diego Jose
    Matias, William Gerson
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2021, 419